Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34369034›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2021

Exploring a collaborative approach to the involvement of patients, carers and the public in the initial education and training of healthcare professionals: A qualitative study of patient experiences.

Lesley Scott, Jessica Hardisty, Hannah Cussons, Kathryn Davison, Helen Driscoll, Suzanne Powell, Andrew Sturrock

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. "Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lesley ScottFaculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, The Sciences Complex, City Campus, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2458-6344
Jessica HardistyFaculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, The Sciences Complex, City Campus, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0387-2202
Hannah CussonsFaculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, The Sciences Complex, City Campus, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.
Kathryn DavisonFaculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, The Sciences Complex, City Campus, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1648-4962
Helen DriscollFaculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, The Sciences Complex, City Campus, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9684-9345
Suzanne PowellFaculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, The Sciences Complex, City Campus, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.
Andrew SturrockFaculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, The Sciences Complex, City Campus, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3316-1412
University of Sunderland · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to explore patients' experiences of their involvement in the design and delivery of interprofessional education interventions focussing on mental ill-health for students studying in undergraduate healthcare and healthcare-related programmes.

designA qualitative methodology using a Grounded Theory approach was used to undertake an iterative series of focus groups with members of a university's Patient, Carer and Public Involvement (PCPI) Group who have a history of mental ill-health and were involved in the development and delivery of educational interventions for students on undergraduate healthcare and healthcare-related programmes. Their experiences of being involved in teaching and learning activities, collaboration with academic staff and integration into the academic faculty were explored. Constant comparative analysis facilitated the identification and prioritisation of salient themes.

resultsFive salient inter-related themes emerged from the data: (1) reduced stigma and normalisation of experience of illness; (2) enhanced self-worth; (3) improved well-being; (4) community and connection; and (5) enduring benefits.

conclusionsA supportive university community and a designated academic PCPI co-ordinator facilitate a supportive environment for patients and carers to develop as educators, contribute to the training of future healthcare professionals and improve their own personal well-being. Appropriately resourced and well-supported initiatives to integrate patients, carers and the public into the functions of an academic faculty can result in tangible benefits to individuals and facilitate meaningful and enduring connections between the university and the wider community within which it is situated. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: Patients have been involved in the design of the teaching and learning initiatives that this study was primarily focused on. Patients were given autonomy in determining how their experiences should be incorporated into teaching and learning experiences.

Indexed as

CaregiversHealth PersonnelDelivery of Health CareHumansPatient Outcome AssessmentQualitative Researchinterprofessional educationmental healthpatient involvement

Identifiers

PMID34369034
PMCPMC8628596
OpenAlexW3188004962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.