Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34368950›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2021

Chronic non-invasive ventilation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Tim Raveling, Judith Vonk, Fransien M Struik, Roger Goldstein, Huib Am Kerstjens, Peter J Wijkstra, Marieke L Duiverman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06489379 (High Flow Nasal Oxygen for Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in the Emergency Room), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06489379 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

High Flow Nasal Oxygen for Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in the Emergency Room: the GLAMOUR Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCSRan2024 to 2026Enrolled234ConditionsRespiratory Distress Syndrome, AdultArmshigh flow nasal cannula, standard oxygen
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Usefulness of the SRespiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tim RavelingDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Judith VonkGroningen Research Institute of Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Fransien M StruikDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Roger GoldsteinDivision of Respiratory Medicine, West Park Healthcare Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Huib Am KerstjensDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Peter J WijkstraDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Marieke L DuivermanDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLWest Park Healthcare Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is increasingly being used to treat people with COPD who have respiratory failure, but the evidence supporting this treatment has been conflicting.

objectivesTo assess the effects of chronic non-invasive ventilation at home via a facial mask in people with COPD, using a pooled analysis of IPD and meta-analysis. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Airways Register of Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, AMED, proceedings of respiratory conferences, clinical trial registries and bibliographies of relevant studies. We conducted the latest search on 21 December 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing chronic NIV for at least five hours per night for three consecutive weeks or more (in addition to standard care) versus standard care alone, in people with COPD. Studies investigating people initiated on NIV in a stable phase and studies investigating NIV commenced after a severe COPD exacerbation were eligible, but we reported and analysed them separately. The primary outcomes were arterial blood gases, health-related quality of life (HRQL), exercise capacity (stable COPD) and admission-free survival (post-exacerbation COPD). Secondary outcomes for both populations were: lung function, COPD exacerbations and admissions, and all-cause mortality. For stable COPD, we also reported respiratory muscle strength, dyspnoea and sleep efficiency. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. After inclusion of a study, we requested the IPD. We analysed continuous and time-to-event data using linear- and cox-regression mixed-effect models with a random effect on study level. We analysed dichotomous IPD using generalised estimating equations. We adjusted all models for age and sex. We assessed changes in outcomes after three and 12 months.  We also conducted a meta-analysis on aggregated trial data. MAIN

resultsWe included 14 new RCTs in this review update, in addition to the seven previously included. Seventeen studies investigated chronic NIV in stable COPD and four studies investigated chronic NIV commenced after a severe COPD exacerbation. Three studies compared NIV to sham continuous positive airway pressure (2 to 4 cmH AUTHORS'

conclusionsRegardless of the timing of initiation, chronic NIV improves daytime hypercapnia. In addition, in stable COPD, survival seems to be improved and there might be a short term HRQL benefit. In people with persistent hypercapnia after a COPD exacerbation, chronic NIV might prolong admission-free survival without a beneficial effect on HRQL. In stable COPD, future RCTs comparing NIV to a control group receiving standard care might no longer be warranted, but research should focus on identifying participant characteristics that would define treatment success. Furthermore, the optimal timing for initiation of NIV after a severe COPD exacerbation is still unknown.

Indexed as

Noninvasive VentilationPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRespiratory InsufficiencyDisease ProgressionDyspneaHumansQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID34368950
PMCPMC8407093
OpenAlexW3192913368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.