ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2021
First clinical assessment of [
Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- FromACS omega · 2026Article
- First-in-human PET study of [Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Designing a Small Molecule for PET Radiotracing: [Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Exploratory Study of Sex Differences in P-Glycoprotein Function at the Blood-Brain Barrier.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Oral Administration of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2025Article
- Quantification of P-glycoprotein function at the human blood-brain barrier using [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objective5-(1-(2-[
methods[
resultsNo serious adverse events occurred throughout the study period. Although biodistribution implied hepatobiliary excretion, secretion of radioactivity from liver to small intestine through the gallbladder was very slow. Total renal excreted radioactivity recovered during 6 h after injection was < 2%ID. Absorbed dose was the highest in the pancreas (mean ± SD, 203 ± 45 μGy/MBq) followed by the liver (83 ± 11 μGy/MBq). Mean effective dose with and without urination was 17 ± 1 μSv/MBq. [
conclusionsThis initial evaluation indicated that [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.