Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34368911›Full record

Observational studyJournal of robotic surgery2022

Right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis for cancer: a prospective comparison between robotics and laparoscopy.

Nadia Sorgato, Enzo Mammano, Tania Contardo, Fabrizio Vittadello, Giacomo Sarzo, Emilio Morpurgo

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of robotic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Robotic right colectomy is associated with reduced conversion to open surgery in patients with obesity.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nadia SorgatoDepartment of Surgery, Regional Specialized Centre for Video-Laparoscopic Robotic Surgery, Hospital of Camposampiero, Via Pietro Cosma n.1-35012-Camposampiero, Padua, Italy. nadia.sorgato@aulss6.veneto.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7254-8372
Enzo MammanoDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Sant' Antonio, Via Jacopo Facciolati n. 71-35127, Padua, Italy.
Tania ContardoDepartment of Surgery, Regional Specialized Centre for Video-Laparoscopic Robotic Surgery, Hospital of Camposampiero, Via Pietro Cosma n.1-35012-Camposampiero, Padua, Italy.
Fabrizio VittadelloDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Sant' Antonio, Via Jacopo Facciolati n. 71-35127, Padua, Italy.
Giacomo SarzoDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Sant' Antonio, Via Jacopo Facciolati n. 71-35127, Padua, Italy.
Emilio MorpurgoDepartment of Surgery, Regional Specialized Centre for Video-Laparoscopic Robotic Surgery, Hospital of Camposampiero, Via Pietro Cosma n.1-35012-Camposampiero, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotics in right colectomy are still under debate. Available studies compare different techniques of ileocolic anastomosis but results are non-conclusive. Our study aimed to compare intraoperative outcomes, and short-term postoperative results between robotic and standard laparoscopic right colectomies for cancer with intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA) fashioned with the same technique. All consecutive patients scheduled for laparoscopic or robotic right hemicolectomies with ICA for cancer in two hospitals, one of which is a tertiary care centre, were prospectively enrolled in our prospective observational study, from April 2018 to December 2019. ICA was fashioned with the same stapled hand-sewn technique. Continuous and categorical variables were analysed using t test and chi-squared test as required. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Forty patients underwent laparoscopic surgery, and 48 underwent robotic right colectomy and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Operative time was not statistically different between the two groups (robotic group 265.9 min vs laparoscopic group 254.2 min, p = 0.29). The robotic group had a significantly shorter time for stump oversewing (ileum reinforcement: robotic group 9.3 min vs laparoscopic group 14.2 min, p < 0.001; colon reinforcement: robotic 7.7. min, laparoscopy 13.9 min, p < 0.001) and for ICA (robotic 31.6 min vs laparoscopy 43.0, p < 0.001). One patient underwent extracorporeal anastomosis in the robotic group. The short-term outcomes were comparable between standard laparoscopic and robotic right colectomies with ICA. The limitation of the study is its small sample size and the fact that it was done in two institutions under the supervision of one person. Our data demonstrate that intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis is safe, and faster and easier with robotic systems. Robotics can facilitate more challenging ICA in minimally invasive surgery.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsLaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresAnastomosis, SurgicalColectomyHumansOperative TimeProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeColon cancerIntracorporeal anastomosisLaparoscopic surgeryRight colectomyRobotic surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.