SynthesisHuman genetics2021
The clinical utility of exome and genome sequencing across clinical indications: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Human genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Exome sequencing early in outpatient evaluation in NCGENES 2: Changing the course of the diagnostic odyssey?HGG advances · 2026Article
- RankVar: machine learning-based variant ranking and reinterpretation for rare genetic diseases.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- Translating transcriptomics analysis into diagnostic workflows: clinical variant identification and interpretation in hypothesis-driven and hypothesis-free approaches.EBioMedicine · 2026Article
- Neuroregression in Childhood: A Red Flag for Inborn Errors of Metabolism.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Determinants of DNA-sequence-based Diagnostic Yield in the CSER Consortium.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Resolving Diagnostic Uncertainty in Neurodevelopmental Disorders Using Exome Sequencing Supported by Literature-Based Multi-Omics Evidence.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- The clinical utility of genome sequencing is multi-dimensional: experience from the Hong Kong Genome Project.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Toward the establishment of best practice guidelines for human research in Genomic Medicine in Brazil.Genetics and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Federated, governed, and interoperable? The emerging architecture of public human genomic data infrastructures: a European perspective.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Determining the value of genomics in healthcare.Nature medicine · 2025Review
- Treading the Path with Caution: Interpreting the Whole Exome Sequencing Data for Mendelian Disorders.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Adult genomic medicine: lessons from a multisite study of 2700 patients.Genome medicine · 2025Article
- Long read whole genome sequencing-based discovery of structural variants and their role in aetiology of non-syndromic autism spectrum disorder in India.BMC medical genomics · 2025Article
- Article
- Putting control into parents' hands: Parent experiences with a genomic results e-booklet.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Introduction to androgenetics: terminology, approaches, and impactful studies across 60 years.Andrology · 2025Review
- A roadmap for genome projects to foster psychosocial and economic evidence to further policy and practice.Communications medicine · 2025Review
- Diagnostic impact of whole exome sequencing in neurometabolic disorders in Syrian children: a single center experience.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- An outlier approach: advancing diagnosis of neurological diseases through integrating proteomics into multi-omics guided exome reanalysis.NPJ genomic medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Exome sequencing and genome sequencing have the potential to improve clinical utility for patients undergoing genetic investigations. However, evidence of clinical utility is limited to pediatric populations; we aimed to fill this gap by conducting a systematic review of the literature on the clinical utility of exome/genome sequencing across disease indications in pediatric and adult populations. MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched between 2016 and 2020. Quantitative studies evaluating diagnostic yield were included; other measures of clinical utility such as changes to clinical management were documented if reported. Two reviewers screened, extracted data, and appraised risk of bias. Fifty studies met our inclusion criteria. All studies reported diagnostic yield, which ranged from 3 to 70%, with higher range of yields reported for neurological indications and acute illness ranging from 22 to 68% and 37-70%, respectively. Diagnoses triggered a range of clinical management changes including surveillance, reproductive-risk counseling, and identifying at-risk relatives in 4-100% of patients, with higher frequencies reported for acute illness ranging from 67 to 95%. The frequency of variants of uncertain significance ranged from 5 to 85% across studies with a potential trend of decreasing frequency over time and higher rates identified in patients of non-European ancestry. This review provides evidence for a higher range of diagnostic yield of exome/genome sequencing compared to standard genetic tests, particularly in neurological and acute indications. However, we identified significant heterogeneity in study procedures and outcomes, precluding a meaningful meta-analysis and certainty in the evidence available for decision-making. Future research that incorporates a comprehensive and consistent approach in capturing clinical utility of exome/genome sequencing across broader ancestral groups is necessary to improve diagnostic accuracy and yield and allow for analysis of trends over time.Prospero registration CRD42019094101.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34368901What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.