ArticleMolecular medicine reports2021
Comparative analysis of the autism‑related variants between different autistic children in a family pedigree.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic Traces in Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Whole Exome Sequencing Study from Türkiye.Genes · 2026Article
- Structure, activity and function of the lysine methyltransferase SETD5.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aimed to provide evidence for the genetic heterogeneity of familial autism spectrum disorder (ASD), which might help to improve our understanding of the complex polygenic basis of this disease. Whole‑exome sequencing (WES) was performed on two autistic children in a family pedigree, and reasonable conditions were set for preliminarily screening variant annotations. Sanger sequencing was used to verify the preliminarily screened variants and to determine the possible sources. In addition, autism‑related genes were screened according to autism databases, and their variants were compared between two autistic children. The results showed that there were 21 genes respectively for autistic children Ⅳ2 and Ⅳ4, preliminarily screened from all variants based on the harmfulness (high) and quality (high or medium) of the variants, as well as the association between mutant genes and autism in human gene mutation database. Furthermore, candidate autism‑related genes were screened according to the evidence score of >4 in the Autism KnowledgeBase (AutismKB) database or ≥3 in the AutDB database. A total of 11 and 10 candidate autism‑related genes were identified in the autistic children Ⅳ2 and Ⅳ4, respectively. Candidate genes with an evidence score of >16 in AutismKB were credible autism‑related genes, which included LAMC3, JMJD1C and CACNA1H in child Ⅳ2, as well as SCN1A, SETD5, CHD7 and KCNMA1 in child Ⅳ4. Other than the c.G1499A mutation of SCN1A, which is known to be associated with Dravet syndrome, the specific missense variant loci of other six highly credible putative autism‑related genes were reported for the first time, to the best of the authors' knowledge, in the present study. These credible autism‑related variants were inherited not only from immediate family members but also from extended family members. In summary, the present study established a reasonable and feasible method for screening credible autism‑related genes from WES results, which by be worth extending into clinical practice. The different credible autism‑related genes between the two autistic children indicated a complex polygenic architecture of ASD, which may assist in the early diagnosis of this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.