SynthesisInteractive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2021
Prediction of right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis comparing echocardiographic parameters.
Synthesis in Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Echocardiographic Parameters of Right Ventricular Size and Function Associated With Right Heart Failure After Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2025Pooled it
- Prediction of Right Heart Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device: Opening Pandora's Box.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Echocardiographic predictors of right ventricular failure following left ventricular assist device implantation: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Global cardiology science & practice · 2025Article
- Predicting right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implant: A novel approach.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Right heart failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: latest insights and knowledge gaps on mechanism and prediction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- The Prognostic Role of Pulmonary Arterial Elastance in Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Contemporary clinical role of echocardiography in patients with advanced heart failure.Heart failure reviews · 2024Review
- Pressure-dimension index and left ventricular sphericity index following HeartMate II and HeartMate 3 implantation.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Right ventricular dysfunction in left ventricular assist device candidates: is it time to change our prospective?Heart failure reviews · 2024Review
- How to Select Patients for Left Ventricular Assist Devices? A Guide for Clinical Practice.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Proportion of right ventricular failure and echocardiographic predictors in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2023Review
- Right heart failure in left heart disease: imaging, functional, and biochemical aspects of right ventricular dysfunction.Heart failure reviews · 2023Review
- Predicting, Recognizing, and Treating Right Heart Failure in Patients Undergoing Durable LVAD Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Prediction, prevention, and management of right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: A comprehensive review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Left ventricular assist devices and right ventricular failure prediction: Quo Vadis?Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesBetween 10% and 40% of patients who receive a left ventricular assistance device (LVAD) suffer from right ventricular failure (RVF) shortly after the device is implanted. Patients with post-LVAD RVF tend to have poor outcomes. Only a few predictive factors concerning the right ventricle (RV) have been investigated. Our goal was to search for non-invasive variables that correlate with RV function, focusing on echocardiographic parameters of the RV.
methodsWe selected 3 parameters: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, right ventricular fractional area change and right ventricular global longitudinal strain. We searched the literature and pooled relevant studies in a meta-analysis. Finally, we performed a statistical analysis to confirm whether each parameter was a reliable predictor of RVF after LVAD implantation.
resultsWe retained 19 articles involving a total of 1561 patients. We found a pooled standardized mean deviation of -0.13 cm for the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, with the lower and upper tails of -0.21 and -0.04 cm, respectively. Concerning the right ventricular fractional area change, the averaged standardized mean deviation was equal to -2.61%, with the lower and upper extremities of -4.12% and -1.09%, respectively. Finally, regarding the global longitudinal strain, the standardized mean deviation was equal to -2.06% with an uncertainty value between -3.23% and -0.88%.
conclusionsThe tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion could be a reliable parameter in RVF prediction. The right ventricular fractional area change and global longitudinal strain are likely to be stronger predictors of RVF after LVAD implantation. Prospective studies should be carried out to confirm this observation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.