Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34368797›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2021

Reasons for being unsure or unwilling regarding intention to take COVID-19 vaccine among Japanese people: A large cross-sectional national survey.

Shuhei Nomura, Akifumi Eguchi, Daisuke Yoneoka, Takayuki Kawashima, Yuta Tanoue, Michio Murakami, Haruka Sakamoto, Keiko Maruyama-Sakurai, Stuart Gilmour, Shoi Shi and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Profiling vaccine hesitancy in nursing to tailor public healthcare policies: A cross-sectional international study.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Shuhei NomuraDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Akifumi EguchiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Daisuke YoneokaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Takayuki KawashimaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuta TanoueInstitute for Business and Finance, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.
Michio MurakamiDepartment of Health Risk Communication, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan.
Haruka SakamotoDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Keiko Maruyama-SakuraiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Stuart GilmourGraduate School of Public Health, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Shoi ShiDepartment of Systems Pharmacology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki KunishimaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Satoshi KanekoDepartment of Ecoepidemiology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Megumi AdachiDepartment of Global Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Koki ShimadaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiko YamamotoNational Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroaki MiyataDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Keio University · JPChiba University · JPFukushima Medical University · JPNagasaki University · JPNational Center For Child Health and Development · JPRIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research · JPSt. Luke's International University · JPSt. Marianna University School of Medicine · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPTokyo Institute of Technology · JPWaseda University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying and understanding reasons for being unsure or unwilling regarding intention to be vaccinated against coronavirus disease (COVID-19) may help to inform future public health messages aimed at increasing vaccination coverage. We analyzed a broad array of individual's psychological dispositions with regard to decision-making about COVID-19 vaccination in Japan.

methodsA nationally representative cross-sectional web survey was conducted with 30053 Japanese adults aged 20 years or older at the end of February 2021. In addition to the question on the individual's intention to be vaccinated against COVID-19, respondents were asked about their sociodemographic, health-related, and psychological characteristics as well as information sources about COVID-19 and their levels of trust. Also, those who responded 'not sure' or 'no' regarding intention to take COVID-19 vaccine were asked why. Multinomial logistic regression with sparse group Lasso (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) penalty was used to compute adjusted odds ratios for factors associated with the intention (not sure/no versus yes).

findingsThe percentages of respondents who answered 'not sure' or 'no' regarding intention to be vaccinated against COVID-19 vaccine were 32.9% and 11.0%, respectively. After adjusting for covariates, the perceived risks of COVID-19, perceived risk of a COVID-19 vaccine, perceived benefits of a COVID-19 vaccine, trust in scientists and public authorities, and the belief that healthcare workers should be vaccinated were significantly associated with vaccination intention. Several sources of information about COVID-19 were also significantly associated with vaccination intention, including physicians, nurses, and television, medical information sites with lower odds of being unsure or unwilling, and internet news sites, YouTube, family members, and scientists and researchers with higher odds. The higher the level of trust in television as a source of COVID-19 information, the higher the odds of responding 'not sure' (odds ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.21). We also demonstrated that many respondents presented concerns about the side effects and safety of a COVID-19 vaccine as a major reason for being unsure or unwilling. To decide whether or not to get the vaccine, many respondents requested more information about the compatibilities between the vaccine and their personal health conditions, whether other people had been vaccinated, the effectiveness of vaccines against variants, and doctors' recommendations.

interpretationOur findings suggest that public health messaging based on the sociodemographic and psychological characteristics of those who are unsure or unwilling regarding intention to be vaccinated against COVID-19 vaccine may help to increase vaccine uptake amongst this population.

fundingThe present work was supported in part by a grant from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan (H29-Gantaisaku-ippan-009).

Indexed as

attitudes towards vaccinationsCOVID-19information sourceJapanpsychological dispositions

Identifiers

PMID34368797
PMCPMC8324415
OpenAlexW3189888061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.