Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34368762›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy

Bariatric procedures and microbiota: patient selection and outcome prediction.

Pierluigi Puca, Valentina Petito, Lucrezia Laterza, Loris Riccardo Lopetuso, Matteo Neri, Federica Del Chierico, Ivo Boskoski, Antonio Gasbarrini, Franco Scaldaferri

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pierluigi PucaDipartimento di Medicina e chirurgia traslazionale, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore-Sede Di Roma, Roma, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0935-8853
Valentina PetitoDipartimento di Medicina e chirurgia traslazionale, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore-Sede Di Roma, Roma, Italy.
Lucrezia LaterzaCEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
Loris Riccardo LopetusoCEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
Matteo NeriDepartment of Medicine and Ageing Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italia.
Federica Del ChiericoMultimodal Laboratory Medicine Research Area, Unit of Human Microbiome, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4204-4736
Ivo BoskoskiCEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Dipartimento di Medicina e chirurgia traslazionale, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore-Sede Di Roma, Roma, Italy; Cemad, Uoc Medicina Interna E Gastroenterologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8194-2670
Antonio GasbarriniCEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Dipartimento di Medicina e chirurgia traslazionale, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore-Sede Di Roma, Roma, Italy; Cemad, Uoc Medicina Interna E Gastroenterologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Franco ScaldaferriCEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Dipartimento di Medicina e chirurgia traslazionale, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore-Sede Di Roma, Roma, Italy; Cemad, Uoc Medicina Interna E Gastroenterologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8334-7541
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITBambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity is a major health issue throughout the world and bariatric surgery plays a key role in its management and treatment. The role of microbiota in determining the pathogenesis of obesity has been widely studied, while its role in determining the outcome of bariatric surgery is an emerging issue that will be an outcome in near future studies. Studies on mice first showed the key role of microbiota in determining obesity, highlighting the fat mass increase in mice transplanted with microbiota from fat individuals, as well as the different microbiota composition between mice undergone to low-fat or high-fat diets. This led to characterize the asset of microbiota composition in obesity: increased abundance of Firmicutes, reduced abundance of Bacteroidetes and other taxonomical features. Variations on the composition of gut microbiome have been detected in patients undergone to diet and/or bariatric surgery procedures. Patients undergone to restricting diets showed lower level of trimethylamine

Indexed as

bariatric endoscopybariatric surgerygut microbiotaobesity

Identifiers

PMID34368762
PMCPMC8299956
OpenAlexW3185395546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.