ArticleInfection prevention in practice2020
Overview of risk factor and bacterial pattern in patient with surgical site infection after caesarean section in Ciptomangunkusumo Hospital from 2016 to 2018.
Article in Infection prevention in practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Demographic profile, unplanned status and intraoperative situations increase surgical site infection in cesarean delivery: conclusions from a prospective study in central India.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- A comprehensive study on the risk factors and pathogen analysis of postoperative wound infections following caesarean section procedures.International wound journal · 2024Article
- Incidence, Bacterial Profile and Predictors of Surgical Site Infection After Cesarean Section in Ethiopia, A Prospective Cohort Study.International journal of women's health · 2023Article
- Turmeric extract gel and honey in post-cesarean section wound healing: A preliminary study.F1000Research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Caesarean section is one of the most commonly performed surgeries both in the hospital. The incidence of infections in cesarean section varies greatly around the world at 3-15%. SSI on is a multifactorial process that starts from the perioperative preparation, the patient, the type of surgery, the type of germ and other factors. Aims: To determine the characteristics of patients, bacterial patterns, and risk factors for the incidence of SSI in Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital in 2016-2018. Method: This study was an observational study using a retrospective cohort method. The subject of this study were patients undergoing cesarean section in Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital in 2016-2018 recruited using consecutive sampling method. Based on the data obtained, bivariate and multivariate analysis were conducted to determine the factors affecting post-caesarean SSI. Results: A total of 2052 subjects were included in the study. There were 85 cases of surgical site infection (SSI) out of 2052 operations (4.14 %). A total of 85 SSI cases and 1967 control groups were included in the risk factor analysis. The most common bacteria found in surgical site infection culture were Staphylococcus aureus (16,5%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (12,9%), Escherichia coli (9,4%), Enterococcus faecalis (9,4%), and others (21,2%). Variables associated with SSI in this study is fetal distress (p=0,002; AOR = 2,265 CI 95 % 1,350-3,801) and BMI ≥30 kg/m Conclusion: Factors influencing the incidence of SSI post cesarean section was fetal distress (p=0,002; AOR = 2,265 CI 95 % 1,350-3,801) and BMI ≥30 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.