ArticleInfection prevention in practice2020
Management of
Article in Infection prevention in practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing success rates in central venous catheter salvage for catheter-related bloodstream infections in adult patients on home parenteral nutrition: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2021Pooled it
- Antimicrobial Resistance Is Prevalent inMicroorganisms · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
objectiveWe wished to determine whether our practice of shortened duration of intravenous antimicrobial therapy in favour of oral administration proved as effective as recommended guidelines in a mixed oncology patient cohort.
methodsRetrospective review of patient records that included any SAB episode among oncology patients from January 2002 to December 2015. Medical chart reviews were undertaken to determine patient demographics, clinical management & antimicrobial therapy, duration of stay, presence of a central venous catheter (CVC) and outcome.
resultsOur CVC removal rate was just 73% in SAB where CVC was the identified source of infection, with an attributable mortality rate (<4%) far lower than would be expected. Antimicrobial therapy durations were considerably lower (10 days) than current recommendations of 14 days IV therapy. The recurrence rate of 15% was also significantly lower than has been reported previously.
conclusionsOur observations contribute new insights concerning the management of SAB in oncology patients. Our findings suggest that therapeutic approaches should perhaps remain individualised and reflective of patient characteristics taking into consideration the complex nature of oncology patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.