Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34368660›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2021

Performance of five pulse oximeters to detect hypoxaemia as an indicator of severe illness in children under five by frontline health workers in low resource settings - A prospective, multicentre, single-blinded, trial in Cambodia, Ethiopia, South Sudan, and Uganda.

Kevin Baker, Max Petzold, Akasiima Mucunguzi, Alexandra Wharton-Smith, Emily Dantzer, Tedila Habte, Lena Matata, Diana Nanyumba, Morris Okwir, Monica Posada and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Implementation of a fast triage score for patients arriving to a low resource hospital in Uganda.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Kevin BakerMalaria Consortium, London, United Kingdom.
Max PetzoldSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Akasiima MucunguziMalaria Consortium, Kampala, Uganda.
Alexandra Wharton-SmithMalaria Consortium, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Emily DantzerMalaria Consortium, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Tedila HabteMalaria Consortium, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Lena MatataMalaria Consortium, Juba, South Sudan.
Diana NanyumbaMalaria Consortium, Kampala, Uganda.
Morris OkwirMalaria Consortium, Juba, South Sudan.
Monica PosadaMalaria Consortium, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Anteneh SebsibeMalaria Consortium, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Jill NicholsonMalaria Consortium, London, United Kingdom.
Madeleine MarasciuloMalaria Consortium, Raleigh, United States.
Rasa IzadnegahdarBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, United States.
Tobias AlfvénDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karin KällanderMalaria Consortium, London, United Kingdom.
Cambodia National Malaria Center · KHMalaria Consortium · UGMalaria Consortium · GBUniversity of Juba · SSGates Foundation · USKarolinska Institutet · SEMalaria Consortium · USUnited Nations Children's Fund · USUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow blood oxygen saturation (SpO

methodsFive pulse oximeters (POx) which passed laboratory testing, out of an initial 32 potential pulse oximeters, were evaluated by frontline health workers for performance, defined as agreement between the SpO

findingsTwo finger-tip pulse oximeters (Contec and Devon), two handheld pulse oximeters (Lifebox and Utech), and one phone pulse oximeter (Masimo) passed the laboratory testing. They were evaluated for performance on 1,313 children under five years old by 207 frontline health workers between February and May 2015. Phone and handheld pulse oximeters had greater overall agreement with the reference standard (56%; 95% CI 0.52 - 0.60 to 68%; 95% CI 0.65 - 0.71) than the finger-tip POx (31%; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.36 and 47%; 95% CI 0.42 to 0.52). Fingertip POx performance was substantially lower in the 0-2 month olds; having just 17% and 25% agreement. The finger-tip devices more often underreported SpO

interpretationWhile the Masimo phone pulse oximeter performed best, all handheld POx with age-specific probes performed well in the hands of frontline health workers, further highlighting their suitability as a screening tool of severe illness. The poor performance of the fingertip POx suggests they should not be used in children under five by frontline health workers. It is essential that POx are performance tested on children in routine settings (in vivo), not only in laboratories or controlled settings (in vitro), before being introduced at scale.

fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1054367].

Indexed as

Childhood pneumoniaDiagnostic aidsHealth worker performanceLow-income countryPulse oximeterSevere illness

Identifiers

PMID34368660
PMCPMC8326731
OpenAlexW3186579331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.