Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34368622›Full record

ArticleComputational brain & behavior2021

Human Belief State-Based Exploration and Exploitation in an Information-Selective Symmetric Reversal Bandit Task.

Lilla Horvath, Stanley Colcombe, Michael Milham, Shruti Ray, Philipp Schwartenbeck, Dirk Ostwald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational brain & behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Novelty as a drive of human exploration in complex stochastic environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Individual differences in sequential decision-making.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Active inference and the two-step task.Scientific reports · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lilla HorvathComputational Cognitive Neuroscience, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2089-1440
Stanley ColcombeCenter for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute, Orangeburg, NY USA.
Michael MilhamCenter for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute, Orangeburg, NY USA.
Shruti RayDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ USA.
Philipp SchwartenbeckComputational Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.
Dirk OstwaldInstitute of Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3530-1845

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans often face sequential decision-making problems, in which information about the environmental reward structure is detached from rewards for a subset of actions. In the current exploratory study, we introduce an information-selective symmetric reversal bandit task to model such situations and obtained choice data on this task from 24 participants. To arbitrate between different decision-making strategies that participants may use on this task, we developed a set of probabilistic agent-based behavioral models, including exploitative and explorative Bayesian agents, as well as heuristic control agents. Upon validating the model and parameter recovery properties of our model set and summarizing the participants' choice data in a descriptive way, we used a maximum likelihood approach to evaluate the participants' choice data from the perspective of our model set. In brief, we provide quantitative evidence that participants employ a belief state-based hybrid explorative-exploitative strategy on the information-selective symmetric reversal bandit task, lending further support to the finding that humans are guided by their subjective uncertainty when solving exploration-exploitation dilemmas. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42113-021-00112-3.

Indexed as

Agent-based behavioral modelingBandit problemExploitationExploration

Identifiers

PMID34368622
PMCPMC8327602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.