Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34368598›Full record

ArticlePain reports

Efficacy of an opioid-sparing analgesic protocol in pain control after less invasive cranial neurosurgery.

Shahjehan Ahmad, Ryan Khanna, Alvin Chidozie Onyewuenyi, Nicholas Panos, Rory Breslin, Sepehr Sani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shahjehan AhmadDepartments of Neurosurgery and.ORCID 0000-0001-5518-1222
Ryan KhannaDepartments of Neurosurgery and.ORCID 0000-0002-6345-200X
Alvin Chidozie OnyewuenyiDepartments of Neurosurgery and.ORCID 0000-0002-1634-7186
Nicholas PanosPharmacy, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9868-699X
Rory BreslinDepartments of Neurosurgery and.
Sepehr SaniDepartments of Neurosurgery and.ORCID 0000-0002-1737-5269

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOpioid overuse in postoperative patients is a worrisome trend, and potential alternatives exist which warrant investigation. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in treating postoperative cranial surgery pain has been hampered by concern for inadequate pain control and increased risk of hemorrhagic complications. A safe and effective alternative to opioid-based pain management is critical to improving postoperative care.

objectiveThe objective of this retrospective study was to determine whether an NSAID-based opioid-sparing pain management protocol (OSP) is effective in analgesic control of less invasive cranial surgery patients at 6-, 12-, and 24-hour postoperatively. Secondary aims included investigating differences in hemorrhagic complications.

methodsFive hundred sixty-six consecutive patients who underwent cranial surgery before and after implementation of the celecoxib-based OSP were eligible. Propensity score matching was used to match patients in each cohort.

resultsThe opioid-sparing cohort had lower pain scores at 6 hours (3.45 vs 4.19,

conclusionAn effective alternative to the current standard opioid-based pain management is feasible for less invasive cranial surgery. Determinations of hemorrhage risk and more complex cranial surgery will require larger prospective randomized trials.

Indexed as

CranialFunctionalMultimodalNeurosurgeryNSAIDsOpioidOpioid-sparingPostoperativeSurgery

Identifiers

PMID34368598
PMCPMC8341305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.