Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34368491›Full record

ReviewPorto biomedical journal

Effects of auditory or visual stimuli on gait in Parkinsonic patients: a systematic review.

Marta F D Trindade, Rui A Viana

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Porto biomedical journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07434089 (Gut-Brain Axis and Rehabilitation), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07434089 narecruitingnot on this map

Gut-Brain Axis and Rehabilitation: Study on the Effects of C-Mill Technology on the Intestinal Microbiota of Parkinson's Disease Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino PulejoRan2025 to 2028Enrolled60ConditionsParkinson DiseaseArmsC-Mill technology treadmill equipped with semi-immersive VR, C-Mill treatment without semi-immersive virtual reality (VR), Conventional physiotherapy training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marta F D TrindadeFaculty of Health Sciences, Fernando Pessoa University.
Rui A VianaFaculty of Health Sciences, Fernando Pessoa University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExternal stimuli can improve gait performance in Parkinsons Disease (PD): auditory stimuli can increase velocity and visual stimuli may act at step length.

objectiveTo systematize the scientific evidence about the effects of auditory or visual stimuli on gait in patients with PD.

methodsFrom January 2016 to December 2018, a systematic literature research was conducted in the PubMed/Medline and Web of Science databases. Study designs considered were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies, which evaluated the effects of auditory or visual stimuli on gait in PD. The methodological quality was assessed by the Critical Appraisal Skills Program.

resultsFive articles were included with 232 participants and a methodological rank of mean of 10.3 on the cohort studies (n = 3), 8 on the case control studies (n = 1), and 6 on the RCTs (n = 1). Although 3 evaluated the effects of auditory stimuli on gait in PD, 2 analyzed those of visual stimuli. Based on these, it was verified a significant improvement of diverse gait parameters.

conclusionThe application of auditory or visual stimuli have beneficial effects on gait parameters. Further investigation is required.

Indexed as

auditory perceptionexercisegaitParkinson diseasephysical therapy modalitiesvisual perception

Identifiers

PMID34368491
PMCPMC8341369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.