ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2021
Heart Failure With Mid-range Ejection Fraction: Every Coin Has Two Sides.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anemia and Prognosis in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2026Review
- The Role of MicroRNAs in the Pathophysiology and Management of Heart Failure: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Application.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Prediction model of rehospitalization and mortality in heart failure patients with preserved and mildly reduced ejection fraction: the AD2NNER risk score.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- The impact of heart failure therapy in patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction: a network meta-analysis.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
- Risk factors of short-term, intermediate-term, and long-term cardiac events in patients hospitalized for HFmrEF.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
- Deep Learning Predicts Heart Failure With Preserved, Mid-Range, and Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction From Patient Clinical Profiles.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review summarizes current knowledge regarding clinical epidemiology, pathophysiology, and prognosis for patients with HFmrEF in comparison to HFrEF and HFpEF. Although recommended treatments currently focus on aggressive management of comorbidities, we summarize potentially beneficial therapies that can delay the process of heart failure by blocking the pathophysiology mechanism. More studies are needed to further characterize HFmrEF and identify effective management strategies that can reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality of patients with HFmrEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.