Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34368049›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2021

Equity Effects of Dietary Nudging Field Experiments: Systematic Review.

Benjamin Schüz, Hannah Meyerhof, Lisa Karla Hilz, Jutta Mata

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Cafeteria Online: Nudges for Healthier Food Choices in a University Cafeteria-A Randomized Online Experiment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Preventing type 2 diabetes: A research agenda for behavioural science.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Are You "Nudgeable"? Factors Affecting the Acceptance of Healthy Eating Nudges in a Cafeteria Setting.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Benjamin SchüzFaculty 11, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Hannah MeyerhofFaculty 11, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Lisa Karla HilzFaculty 11, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Jutta MataDepartment of Psychology, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

DietHealth EquityHumansSocial ClassSocioeconomic FactorsVulnerable Populationsdietary behaviourequity effectsfield experimentharvest plotinequalitiesnudgenutrition behaviour

Identifiers

PMID34368049
PMCPMC8342848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.