Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34367937›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Occurrence of High Microsatellite-Instability/Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Nearly 2,000 Human Adenocarcinomas of the Gastrointestinal Tract, Pancreas, and Bile Ducts: A Study From a Large German Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Alexander Quaas, Jan Rehkaemper, Josef Rueschoff, Aylin Pamuk, Thomas Zander, Axel Hillmer, Janna Siemanowski, Jana Wittig, Reinhard Buettner, Patrick Plum and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Carcinogenesis trajectories.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Predictive biomarkers in gastric cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander QuaasInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Jan RehkaemperInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Josef RueschoffInstitute of Pathology, Nordhessen and Targos Molecular Pathology GmbH, Kassel, Germany.
Aylin PamukDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Thomas ZanderDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Axel HillmerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Janna SiemanowskiInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Jana WittigInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Reinhard BuettnerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Patrick PlumDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Felix PoppDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Florian GebauerDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Christiane Josephine BrunsDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Heike LoeserInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Hakan AlakusDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Birgid Schoemig-MarkiefkaInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
University Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionKnowledge of the high microsatellite-instability (MSI-H)/mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) status is of increasing interest for personalized neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy planning. Only a few studies are available on MSI-H distribution in the Northern European Caucasian patient population. In this study, we focused on a large cohort of tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract. MATERIALS AND

methodsSurgical material from a total of 1,965 patients was analyzed for MSI-H/MMRd status (including 1,267 carcinomas of the esophagus or stomach). All tumors were analyzed with an internationally recommended immunohistochemical panel consisting of four antibodies (MLH1, MSH2, PMS2, and MSH6). The results were molecularly objectified.

resultsAdenocarcinomas with MSI-H/MMRd were detected with the following distribution: esophagus (1.4%), stomach (8.3%), small intestine (18.2%), large intestine (8.5%), intrahepatic bile ducts (1.9%), and pancreas (0%). In case of gastric tumors with MSI-H/MMRd, neoadjuvant therapy did not influence the prognosis of patients (p = 0.94). Within all tumor entities with MSI-H/MMRd, patients with a UICC stage 4 were also represented. In this advanced stage, 11.7% of patients with MSS tumors were diagnosed compared to 0.5% of patients with MSI-H tumors relative to the entire tumor collective. DISCUSSION: In this study, the proportion of MSI-H/MMRd tumors in the stomach is smaller than would have been expected in knowledge of the data published by TCGA or AGRC. Negative prognostic effects regarding MSI-H status and neoadjuvant therapy as described by the MAGIC study group were not seen in our cohort. The extent to which the MSI-H/MMRd status should be known for neoadjuvant therapy planning must be clarified in prospective studies in the future. At present, there is no convincing data to dispense the neoadjuvant therapy for gastric carcinoma. Due to the very convincing, positive data regarding the response rates of MSI-H tumors to treatment with PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors, every metastatic carcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract should be tested for its MSI-H status.

Indexed as

esophageal adenocarcinomagastric carcinomahigh microsatellite-instability (MSI-H)microsatellite-instabilityUnion for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage 4

Identifiers

PMID34367937
PMCPMC8343401
OpenAlexW3184552814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.