Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34367804›Full record

ReviewCureus2021

Efficacy and Safety of Peripherally Acting μ-Opioid Receptor Antagonist (PAMORAs) for the Management of Patients With Opioid-Induced Constipation: A Systematic Review.

Martina Rekatsina, Antonella Paladini, Asbjørn M Drewes, Farrah Ayob, Omar Viswanath, Ivan Urits, Oscar Corli, Joseph Pergolizzi, Giustino Varrassi

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Naldemedine for Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients With Cancer: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. PAMORAs in Opioid-Induced Constipation: Are We Following the Guidelines?Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The P2YBMC gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Constipation in Cancer Patients - an Update of Clinical Evidence.Current treatment options in oncology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Martina RekatsinaPain Management, Whipps Cross Hospital Barts Health NHS, London, GBR.
Antonella PaladiniDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Public Health and Life Science (MESVA), University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, ITA.
Asbjørn M DrewesDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, DNK.
Farrah AyobAnesthesia, Barts Health, London, GBR.
Omar ViswanathPain Management, Valley Pain Consultants - Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, USA.
Ivan UritsDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Oscar CorliPain and Palliative Care Research Unit, Mario Negri Institute IRCCS, Milano, ITA.
Joseph PergolizziResearch Department, Nema Research, Inc., Naples, USA.
Giustino VarrassiResearch, Paolo Procacci Foundation, Roma, ITA.
Aalborg University Hospital · DKBarts Health NHS Trust · GBFondazione Roma · ITHarvard University · USMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITNema Research (United States) · USPain Management Institute · USUniversity of L'Aquila · ITWhipps Cross University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In treating chronic and acute pain, opioids are widely used. Although they do provide analgesia, their usage does come with adverse events (AEs). One of the most burdensome is opioid-induced bowel dysfunction, and more specifically opioid-induced constipation (OIC). The pathogenesis of these AEs is well known as the consequence of the action of opioids on m-receptors in the enteric nervous system. In recent years, medicines counteracting this specific action at the receptors have been registered for clinical use: the peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs). The knowledge of their comparative efficacy and tolerability is very important for physicians and patients in opioid therapy. This systematic review of the existing literature on PAMORAs aimed to study the relative clinical advantages and disadvantages. The most important data banks, including "PubMed," "Embase," "CT.gov," "ICTRP" and "CINAHL" were used to find the published material on PAMORAs. The selected publications were examined to systematically analyze the efficacy and safety of the four existing PAMORAs. All of the medications are superior to placebo in reducing OIC. There are few published data on alvimopan used to treat OIC, and it is only indicated for the treatment of post-abdominal surgery ileus. Methylnaltrexone is studied mainly in its subcutaneous (SC) formulation. When used in its oral formulation, it seems more rapid than naloxegol and placebo in the reduction of OIC. Naldemedine is able to produce more spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) when compared to alvimopan and naloxegol. Tolerability was found to be similar for all of them. In particular, they affect the gastrointestinal tract (GI), with flatulence and diarrhea, especially at high dosages. For some of them, nasopharyngitis and abdominal pain were observed as treatment adverse effects (TEAs). Several cardiovascular TEAs were reported after methylnaltrexone use, but it is not clear whether they were consequences of the drug or related to the general conditions of the patients. Considering the existing data, naloxegol and naldemedine seem to be the best choices, with a higher number of spontaneous bowel movements following naldemedine administration.

Indexed as

opioid-induced bowel dysfunctionopioid induced constipationopioidspainpamoraperipherally acting m-opioid receptor antagonist

Identifiers

PMID34367804
PMCPMC8339109
OpenAlexW3179447472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.