ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2021
Assessing the application of human-centered design to translational research.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Schools Unified in Neurodiversity Collaborative: Co-designing a program to enhance educator knowledge and efficacy supporting children with neurodevelopmental disabilities.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2026Article
- A Qualitative Study of CMC Caregivers' Perspectives about their Emotional Well-Being.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2025Article
- Using human-centered design to advance health literacy in local health department programming: a case study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Applying design to design: demonstrating how to create a human-centered design session interview guide for use with adolescents.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Living with multimorbidity: A qualitative exploration of shared experiences of patients, family caregivers, and healthcare professionals in managing symptoms in the United States.Journal of advanced nursing · 2024Article
- Engaging Cancer Care Physicians in Off-Label Drug Clinical Trials: Human-Centered Design Approach.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Article
- Methods and operational aspects of human-centred design into research processes for individuals with multiple chronic conditions: A survey study.Nursing open · 2023Article
- Strategic Team Science Promotes Collaboration and Practice-Based Research at the Research Centers in Minority Institutions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Screening and Referral for Social Determinants of Health: Maternity Patient and Health Care Team Perspectives.Health equity · 2022Article
- Getting To Implementation (GTI)-Teach: A seven-step approach for teaching the fundamentals of implementation science.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2022Article
- Introduction to the themed issue on the design, development, evaluation, and dissemination of team science interventions in clinical and translational research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- Evaluating behavioral intervention technologies: Integrating human-centered design and implementation science outcomes.Digital healthArticle
- Framework for Creating Successful Multidisciplinary Translational Research Teams.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social MedicineArticle
- Communicating Health Research With Plain Language.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHuman-centered design (HCD) training offers the potential to improve both team processes and products. However, the use of HCD to improve the quality of team science is a relatively recent application, and its benefits and challenges have not been rigorously evaluated. We conducted a qualitative study with health sciences researchers trained in HCD methods. We aimed to determine how researchers applied HCD methods and perceived the benefits and barriers to using HCD on research teams.
methodsWe conducted 1-hour, semi-structured interviews with trainees from three training cohorts. Interviews focused on perceptions of the training, subsequent uses of HCD, barriers and facilitators, and perceptions of the utility of HCD to science teams. Data analysis was conducted using Braun and Clarke's process for thematic analysis.
resultsWe interviewed nine faculty and nine staff trained in HCD methods and identified four themes encompassing HCD use, benefits, challenges, and tensions between HCD approaches and academic culture.
conclusionsTrainees found HCD relevant to research teams for stakeholder engagement, research design, project planning, meeting facilitation, and team management. They also described benefits of HCD in five distinct areas: creativity, egalitarianism, structure, efficiency, and visibility. Our data suggest that HCD has the potential to help researchers work more inclusively and collaboratively on interdisciplinary teams and generate more innovative and impactful science. The application of HCD methods is not without challenges; however, we believe these challenges can be overcome with institutional investment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.