Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34367674›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2021

Impact of a statewide computed tomography scan educational campaign on radiation dose and repeat CT scan rates for transferred injured children.

Rosemary Nabaweesi, Chary Akmyradov, Mary E Aitken, Phillip J Kenney, Raghu H Ramakrishnaiah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rosemary NabaweesiUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Medicine (COM), Pediatrics, Little Rock, AR, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2467-4731
Chary AkmyradovUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, COM, Biostatistics, Little Rock, AR, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2579-7146
Mary E AitkenUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Medicine (COM), Pediatrics, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Phillip J KenneyUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, COM, Radiology, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Raghu H RamakrishnaiahUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, COM, Pediatric Radiology, Little Rock, AR, USA.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USArkansas Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeResearch demonstrates that children receive twice as much medical radiation from Computed Tomography (CT) scans performed at non-pediatric facilities as equivalent CTs performed at pediatric trauma centers (PTCs). In 2014, AFMC outreach staff educated Emergency Department (ED) staff on appropriate CT imaging utilization to reduce unnecessary medical radiation exposure. We set out to determine the educational campaign's impact on injured children received radiation dose.

methodsAll injured children who underwent CT imaging and were transferred to a Level I PTC during 2010 to 2013 (pre-campaign) and 2015 (post-campaign) were reviewed. Patient demographics, mode of transportation, ED length of stay, scanned body region, injury severity score, and trauma center level were analyzed. Median effective radiation dose (ERD) controlled for each variable, pre-campaign and post-campaign, was compared using Wilcoxon rank sum test.

resultsThree hundred eighty-five children under 17 years were transferred from 45 and 48 hospitals, pre- and post-campaign. Most (43%) transferring hospitals were urban or critical access hospitals (30%). Pre- and post-campaign patient demographics were similar. We analyzed 482 and 398 CT scans pre- and post-campaign. Overall, median ERD significantly decreased from 3.80 to 2.80. Abdominal CT scan ERD declined significantly from 7.2 to 4.13 (

conclusionA statewide, CT scan educational campaign contributed to ERD decline (lower dose scans and fewer repeat scans) among transferred injured children seen at PTCs. State-level interventions are feasible and can be effective in changing radiology provider practices.

Indexed as

educational campaignevaluationPediatric computed tomography scan protocolsradiation doseradiation safety

Identifiers

PMID34367674
PMCPMC8327550
OpenAlexW3165767598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.