ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2021
Implementation and evaluation of team science training for interdisciplinary teams in an engineering design program.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Barriers and facilitators of conducting research with team science approach: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2023Pooled it
- Markers of Excellence: Professional Development Opportunities in an Organic Chemistry CURE.Journal of chemical education · 2026Article
- Steps toward developing an algorithm to facilitate recognition of translational science.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- The power of social talk: A longitudinal network analysis of conversations in fostering interdisciplinary collaboration.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Team science training for clinical and translational Scientists: An assessment of effectiveness.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Innovations in Remote Teaching of Engineering Design Teams.Annual Conference & Exposition : final program and proceedings. American Society for Engineering Education · 2023Article
- Developing a Translational Team Training Program using the Wisconsin Interventions in Team Science Framework.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Testing the Effects of the Digital Linguistic Landscape on Engineering Education for Smart Construction.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Building an institutional K awardee program at UC Davis through utilization of CTSA resources.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- Introduction to the themed issue on the design, development, evaluation, and dissemination of team science interventions in clinical and translational research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionInterdisciplinary academic teams perform better when competent in teamwork; however, there is a lack of best practices of how to introduce and facilitate the development of effective learning and functioning within these teams in academic environments.
methodsTo close this gap, we tailored, implemented, and evaluated team science training in the year-long Engineering Innovation in Health (EIH) program at the University of Washington (UW), a project-based course in which engineering students across several disciplines partner with health professionals to develop technical solutions to clinical and translational health challenges. EIH faculty from the UW College of Engineering and the Institute of Translational Health Sciences' (ITHS) Team Science Core codeveloped and delivered team science training sessions and evaluated their impact with biannual surveys. A student cohort was surveyed prior to the implementation of the team science trainings, which served as a baseline.
resultsSurvey responses were compared within and between both cohorts (approximately 55 students each Fall Quarter and 30 students each Spring Quarter). Statistically significant improvements in measures of self-efficacy and interpersonal team climate (i.e., psychological safety) were observed within and between teams.
conclusionsTailored team science training provided to student-professional teams resulted in measurable improvements in self-efficacy and interpersonal climate both of which are crucial for teamwork and intellectual risk taking. Future research is needed to determine long-term impacts of course participation on individual and team outcomes (e.g., patents, start-ups). Additionally, adaptability of this model to clinical and translational research teams in alternate formats and settings should be tested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.