Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34367657›Full record

ArticleEvolution letters2021

Larger cells have relatively smaller nuclei across the Tree of Life.

Martino E Malerba, Dustin J Marshall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Denoising image-based spatial transcriptomics data with DenoIST.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Specificity of Nuclear Size Scaling in Frog Erythrocytes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Martino E MalerbaCentre of Geometric Biology, School of Biological Sciences Monash University Melbourne Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7480-4779
Dustin J MarshallCentre of Geometric Biology, School of Biological Sciences Monash University Melbourne Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6651-6219

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Larger cells have larger nuclei, but the precise relationship between cell size and nucleus size remains unclear, and the evolutionary forces that shape this relationship are debated. We compiled data for almost 900 species - from yeast to mammals - at three scales of biological organisation: among-species, within-species, and among-lineages of a species that was artificially selected for cell size. At all scales, we showed that the ratio of nucleus size to cell size (the 'N: C' ratio) decreased systematically in larger cells. Size evolution appears more constrained in nuclei than cells: cell size spans across six orders of magnitude, whereas nucleus size varies by only three. The next important challenge is to determine the drivers of this apparently ubiquitous relationship in N:C ratios across such a diverse array of organisms.

Indexed as

Artificial selectionC‐value enigmagenome size evolutionkaryoplasmic ratiolimiting pool hypothesisnucleoskeletal theorynucleotypic theoryoptimal DNA theoryselfish DNA hypothesis

Identifiers

PMID34367657
PMCPMC8327945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.