Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34367650›Full record

ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2021

Global estimates of service coverage for severe mental disorders: findings from the WHO Mental Health Atlas 2017.

Kara Jaeschke, Fahmy Hanna, Suhailah Ali, Neerja Chowdhary, Tarun Dua, Fiona Charlson

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Neuropsychiatry genetics in Africa.Nature communications · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Self-Injury Mortality: Global Ascertainment and Prevention.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kara JaeschkePolicy and Evaluation Group, Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Wolston Park Rd, Wacol QLD 4076, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6977-1781
Fahmy HannaDepartment of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Suhailah AliPolicy and Evaluation Group, Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Wolston Park Rd, Wacol QLD 4076, Australia.
Neerja ChowdharyDepartment of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Tarun DuaDepartment of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Fiona CharlsonPolicy and Evaluation Group, Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Wolston Park Rd, Wacol QLD 4076, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2876-5040

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study estimated service coverage for severe mental disorders (psychosis, bipolar disorder and moderate-severe depression), globally and regionally, using data collected from the Mental Health Atlas 2017.

methodsService coverage was defined as the proportion of people with a disorder contacting a mental health service among those estimated to have the disorder during a 12-month period. We drew upon 12-month service utilisation data from the Mental Health Atlas 2017. Expected prevalent cases of individual disorders were estimated using the disorder-specific prevalence rate estimates of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 and total population sizes. Methods for assessing the validity of country-reported service utilisation data were developed and applied. OUTCOMES: From 177 countries, 50 countries provided reliable service coverage estimates for psychosis, along with 56 countries for bipolar disorder, and 65 countries for depression. The mean service coverage for psychosis was lowest in low- [10.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.3-30.4)] and lower middle-income countries [21.5% (95% CI 11.9-35.7)] and highest in high-income countries [59.5% (95% CI 42.9-74.1)]. Service coverage for bipolar disorder ranged between 3.1% (95% CI 0.8-11.5) and 10.4% (95% CI 6.7-15.8). Mean service coverage for moderate-severe depression ranged between 2.9% (95% CI 1.3-6.3) for low-income countries and 31.1% (95% CI 18.3-47.6) for high-income countries.

interpretationThe reporting method utilised by the Mental Health Atlas appears to be reliable for psychosis but not for depression. This method of estimating service coverage provides progress in tracking an important indicator for mental health; however, it highlights that considerable work is needed to further develop global mental health information systems.

Indexed as

mental disorderspsychosisUniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID34367650
PMCPMC8320004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.