Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34367589›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2021

Floral attraction and flower visitors of a subcanopy, tropical rainforest tree,

Elektra L Grant, Helen M Wallace, Peter R Brooks, Chris Burwell, Paul W Reddell, Steven M Ogbourne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A new species ofPhytoKeys · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elektra L GrantGenecology Research Centre University of the Sunshine Coast Sippy Downs Qld Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1135-4990
Helen M WallaceCentre for Planetary Health and Food Security and Griffith School of Environment and Science Griffith University Nathan Qld Australia.
Peter R BrooksGenecology Research Centre University of the Sunshine Coast Sippy Downs Qld Australia.
Chris BurwellBiodiversity and Geosciences Program Queensland Museum South Brisbane Qld Australia.
Paul W ReddellEcoBiotics Limited Yungaburra Qld Australia.
Steven M OgbourneGenecology Research Centre University of the Sunshine Coast Sippy Downs Qld Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flowering plants in tropical rainforests rely heavily on pollen vectors for successful reproduction. Research into pollination systems in tropical rainforests is dominated by canopy species, while subcanopy plant-pollinator interactions remain under-represented. The microclimate beneath the rainforest canopy is characterized by low light levels and is markedly different from the canopy environment that receives more light energy.We studied the floral attractants and floral visitors of a dioecious, subcanopy tree,

Indexed as

Australian Wet TropicsdioeciousEBC‐46Euphorbiaceaefloral scentgeneralist pollination syndrometigilanol tiglateunderstory

Identifiers

PMID34367589
PMCPMC8328466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.