Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34367578›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2021

Excluding spatial sampling bias does not eliminate oversplitting in DNA-based species delimitation analyses.

Daniel Lukic, Jonas Eberle, Jana Thormann, Carolus Holzschuh, Dirk Ahrens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Species Diagnosis and DNA Taxonomy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel LukicZoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig Zentrum für Taxonomie und Evolutionsforschung Bonn Germany.
Jonas EberleZoologische Evolutionsbiologie Paris-Lodron-Universität Salzburg Austria.
Jana ThormannZoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig Zentrum für Taxonomie und Evolutionsforschung Bonn Germany.
Carolus HolzschuhVillach Austria.
Dirk AhrensZoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig Zentrum für Taxonomie und Evolutionsforschung Bonn Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3524-7153

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA barcoding and DNA-based species delimitation are major tools in DNA taxonomy. Sampling has been a central debate in this context, because the geographical composition of samples affects the accuracy and performance of DNA barcoding. Performance of complex DNA-based species delimitation is to be tested under simpler conditions in absence of geographic sampling bias. Here, we present an empirical dataset sampled from a single locality in a Southeast-Asian biodiversity hotspot (Laos: Phou Pan mountain). We investigate the performance of various species delimitation approaches on a megadiverse assemblage of herbivorous chafer beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) to infer whether species delimitation suffers in the same way from exaggerate infraspecific variation despite the lack of geographic genetic variation that led to inconsistencies between entities from DNA-based and morphology-based species inference in previous studies. For this purpose, a 658 bp fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (

Indexed as

barcodingcox1geographic sampling biasLaosspecies delimitation

Identifiers

PMID34367578
PMCPMC8328443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.