ReviewTherapeutic advances in drug safety2021
Patient harm from cardiovascular medications.
Review in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of clinical pharmacy services in patients receiving antithrombotic treatment in a randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- A Transition of Care Service to Reduce Hospital Readmissions for High-Risk Cardiology Patients (RECARD): Protocol for a Pre-Post Interventional Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Applying the consolidated framework for implementation research to guide the development, implementation, and evaluation of a cardiology transitions of care program (RECARD trial).BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Qualitative evaluation of ambulance paramedic staff's medication practices and awareness in cardiovascular emergency care.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Pharmacist-Led Transition of Care Services in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Scoping Review.Cardiology · 2026Article
- Network analysis as a tool to illustrate the population-level complex prescribing to community-dwelling people living with dementia.International journal of population data science · 2026Article
- Criteria pharmacists use to refer patients to a post discharge pharmacist review clinic.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025Article
- Enhancing antifungal stewardship: The educational and healthcare benefits of involving pharmacy students in audits.Medical mycology · 2025Article
- Article
- The Association between Birthweight and Use of Cardiovascular Medications: The Role of Health Behaviors.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Article
- The impact of hospital-based post-discharge pharmacist medication review on patient clinical outcomes: A systematic review.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedication harm can lead to hospital admission, prolonged hospital stay and poor patient outcomes. Reducing medication harm is a priority for healthcare organisations worldwide. Recent Australian studies demonstrate cardiovascular (CV) medications are a leading cause of harm. However, they appear to receive less recognition as 'high risk' medications compared with those classified by the medication safety acronym, 'APINCH' (antimicrobials, potassium, insulin, narcotics, chemotherapeutics, heparin). Our aim was to determine the scale and type of medication harm caused by CV medications in healthcare.
methodsA narrative review of adult (>16 years) medication harm literature identified from PubMed and CINAHL databases was undertaken. Studies with the primary outcome of measuring the incidence of medication harm were included. Harm caused by CV medications was described and ranked against other medication classes at four key stages of a patient's healthcare journey. Where specified, the implicated medications and type of harm were investigated.
resultsA total of 75 studies were identified, including seven systematic reviews and three meta-analyses, with most focussing on harm causing hospital admission. CV medications were responsible for approximately 20% of medication harm; however, this proportion increased to 50% in older populations. CV medications were consistently ranked in the top five medication categories causing harm and were often listed as the leading cause.
conclusionCV medications are a leading cause of medication harm, particularly in older adults, and should be the focus of harm mitigation strategies. A practical approach to generate awareness among health professionals is to incorporate 'C' (for CV medications) into the 'APINCH' acronym. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.