Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34367544›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in chronic disease2021

Digital work engagement among Italian neurologists.

Francesco Brigo, Marta Ponzano, Maria Pia Sormani, Marinella Clerico, Gianmarco Abbadessa, Giovanni Cossu, Francesca Trojsi, Fabiana Colucci, Carla Tortorella, Giuseppina Miele and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in chronic disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Can the use of telemedicine facilitate online prescribing for multiple sclerosis treatment?Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Telemedicine application to headache: a critical review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco BrigoDepartment of Neurology, Franz Tappeiner Hospital, Merano, Italy.
Marta PonzanoDepartment of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Via Antonio Pastore, 1, Genova 16126, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4091-4686
Maria Pia SormaniDepartment of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genova, Italy Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genova, Italy.
Marinella ClericoClinical and Biological Sciences Department, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Gianmarco AbbadessaDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, II Clinic of Neurology, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli,' Caserta, Italy.
Giovanni CossuNeurology, Brotzu Hospital, Cagliari, Italy.
Francesca TrojsiDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, II Clinic of Neurology, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli,' Caserta, Italy.
Fabiana ColucciClinical and Biological Sciences Department, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Carla TortorellaDepartment of Neurosciences, S. Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppina MieleDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, II Clinic of Neurology, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli,' Caserta, Italy.
Emanuele SpinaDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Carlo Alberto ArtusiDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Luca CarmiscianoDepartment of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genova, Italy.
Giovanna ServilloNeurology and Stroke Unit, AORN 'A. Cardarelli,' Naples, Italy.
Marco BozzaliDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Maddalena SparacoDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, II Clinic of Neurology, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli,' Caserta, Italy.
Letizia LeocaniInstitute of Experimental Neurology, Ospedale San Raffaele, and Department of Neurology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy.
Roberta LanzilloDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Gioacchino TedeschiDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, II Clinic of Neurology, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli,' Caserta, Italy.
Simona BonavitaDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, II Clinic of Neurology, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli,' Caserta, Italy.
Luigi LavorgnaDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, II Clinic of Neurology, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli,' Caserta, Italy.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Turin · ITUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITAzienda Ospedaliera G. Brotzu · ITCarlo Forlanini Hospital · ITOspedale Antonio Cardarelli · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital health, including telemedicine, is increasingly recommended for the management of chronic neurological disorders, and it has changed the roles of patients and clinicians.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study we aimed to investigate the digital work engagement of Italian neurologists through a survey collected between September 2020 and January 2021. Questionnaires were anonymous and collected demographic characteristics, attitudes towards digital devices and social media, and details about the clinician-patient relationship. We used logistic-regression models to identify characteristics associated with the propensity to communicate with patients using social media.

resultsAmong the 553 neurologists who participated to the study, smartphones and computers were widely preferred compared with tablets; wearable devices were not common, although some neurologists desired them. A total of 48% of participants reported communicating with patients using social media but only a few were in favor of social friendship with patients; WhatsApp was the social media most popular for professional (86%) and personal (98%) purposes. Propensity to communicate with social media was significantly higher among those who were older (

conclusionsThe preferred social media were those which were rapid and which safeguard privacy more effectively; neurologists made many efforts to disprove fake news circulating online, providing help to patients in various ways. This analysis can help direct future interventions for the management of chronic neurological disorders.

Indexed as

Digital healthNeurologyTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34367544
PMCPMC8299881
OpenAlexW3190972988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.