ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2021
Gene Mutation Classification through Text Evidence Facilitating Cancer Tumour Detection.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep-GenMut: Automated genetic mutation classification in oncology: A deep learning comparative study.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Retracted: Gene Mutation Classification through Text Evidence Facilitating Cancer Tumour Detection.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Article
- Classification of clinically actionable genetic mutations in cancer patients.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-12-06Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A cancer tumour consists of thousands of genetic mutations. Even after advancement in technology, the task of distinguishing genetic mutations, which act as driver for the growth of tumour with passengers (Neutral Genetic Mutations), is still being done manually. This is a time-consuming process where pathologists interpret every genetic mutation from the clinical evidence manually. These clinical shreds of evidence belong to a total of nine classes, but the criterion of classification is still unknown. The main aim of this research is to propose a multiclass classifier to classify the genetic mutations based on clinical evidence (i.e., the text description of these genetic mutations) using Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques. The dataset for this research is taken from Kaggle and is provided by the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC). The world-class researchers and oncologists contribute the dataset. Three text transformation models, namely, CountVectorizer, TfidfVectorizer, and Word2Vec, are utilized for the conversion of text to a matrix of token counts. Three machine learning classification models, namely, Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and XGBoost (XGB), along with the Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) model of deep learning, are applied to the sparse matrix (keywords count representation) of text descriptions. The accuracy score of all the proposed classifiers is evaluated by using the confusion matrix. Finally, the empirical results show that the RNN model of deep learning has performed better than other proposed classifiers with the highest accuracy of 70%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.