Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34367523›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of psychotraumatology2021

Piloting sexual assault care centres in Belgium: who do they reach and what care is offered?

Saar Baert, Christine Gilles, Sara Van Belle, Iva Bicanic, Kristien Roelens, Ines Keygnaert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of psychotraumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Saar BaertDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9822-148X
Christine GillesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saint-Pierre University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4738-5924
Sara Van BelleDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2074-0359
Iva BicanicNational Psychotrauma Center for Children and Youth, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Kristien RoelensDepartment of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0973-7554
Ines KeygnaertDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1707-0254
Ghent University · BECentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Pierre · BEGhent University Hospital · BEInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sexual assault (SA) is highly prevalent in Belgium. In order to mitigate the negative consequences for victims of acute SA, Sexual Assault Care Centres (SACCs) were piloted from October 2017 to October 2018 in three Belgian hospitals. SACCs offer medical and psychological care, forensic examination and the possibility to report to the police at the SACC. Objective: Aiming to improve SACC services, we quantitatively assessed the number and characteristics of victims attending the SACC, the SA they experienced, and the care they received over 12 months upon admission. Method: Data on victims presenting at the SACC were routinely collected in electronic patient files by the SACC personnel between 25 October 2017 and 31 October 2019. These data were analysed in IBM SPSS Statistics 25. Results: Within the first year 931 victims attended the SACCs. Mean age was 24.5 years (SD = 12.8), and one-third were under 18. The majority were female (90.5%) and 63.1% presented for rape. About one-third of the victims were considered vulnerable due to previous SA (35.6%), prior psychiatric consultation (38.7%) or disability (8.5%). The assailant was known to the victim in 59.2% of the cases. Of all SACC presentations, 35.2% self-referred to the SACC while 40.9% were referred by the police. Two out of three victims attended the SACC within 72 h post-assault. Respectively 74.7% of victims received medical care, 60.6% a forensic examination, 50.2% psychological care, and 68.7% reported to the police. Conclusion: Despite the absence of promotion campaigns, the SACCs received a high number of victims during the pilot year. Use of acute and follow-up services was high, although new approaches to offer more accessible psychological support should be explored. The big proportion of vulnerable victims warrants careful monitoring and adaptation of care pathways.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesBelgiumCrime VictimsFemaleHospitalsHumansPilot ProjectsPoliceRapeReferral and ConsultationSex OffensesYoung AdultAsalto sexualpost traumatic stress disorderrapeSexual assaulttrastorno de estrés postraumáticoviolación创伤后应激障碍强奸性侵犯

Identifiers

PMID34367523
PMCPMC8317926
OpenAlexW3185622756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.