Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34367363›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2021

Distinct brain oscillatory responses for the perception and identification of one's own body from other's body.

Samet Çelik, Rümeysa Büşra Doğan, Cennet Sena Parlatan, Bahar Güntekin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samet ÇelikGraduate School of Health Sciences, Program of Neuroscience Ph.D, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0578-3126
Rümeysa Büşra DoğanGraduate School of Health Sciences, Program of Neuroscience Ph.D, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Cennet Sena ParlatanGraduate School of Health Sciences, Program of Neuroscience Ph.D, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bahar GüntekinGraduate School of Health Sciences, Program of Neuroscience Ph.D, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0860-0524

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The body recognition process includes complex visual processing, the sensation, perception, and distinction stages of the stimulus. This study examined this process by using the time-frequency analysis of EEG signals and analyzed the obtained data by using the event-related oscillations method. This study aimed to examine the oscillatory brain responses and distinguish one's own body from other's body. In the present study, 17 young adults were included and the EEGs were recorded with 32 electrodes placed in different locations. Event-related power spectrum and phase-locking analyzes were performed. ITC and ERSP data were analyzed using 2 (condition) × 11 (location) × 2 (hemisphere) ANOVA Design. As we observed a prolonged response in the theta band in the grand averages, we included the time variable in the overall model. As a result, we found that the phase-locking and the event-related power spectrum of the theta response in recognizing one's own body were higher when compared to the phase-locking and the event-related power spectrum of the theta response in recognizing others' body (

Indexed as

Body recognitionEEGEvent-related oscillations

Identifiers

PMID34367363
PMCPMC8286911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.