Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34367231›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021

Multi-Omics Data Fusion for Cancer Molecular Subtyping Using Sparse Canonical Correlation Analysis.

Lin Qi, Wei Wang, Tan Wu, Lina Zhu, Lingli He, Xin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Powerful significance testing for unbalanced clusters.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lin QiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China.
Wei WangDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China.
Tan WuDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China.
Lina ZhuDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China.
Lingli HeDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China.
Xin WangDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is now clear that major malignancies are heterogeneous diseases associated with diverse molecular properties and clinical outcomes, posing a great challenge for more individualized therapy. In the last decade, cancer molecular subtyping studies were mostly based on transcriptomic profiles, ignoring heterogeneity at other (epi-)genetic levels of gene regulation. Integrating multiple types of (epi)genomic data generates a more comprehensive landscape of biological processes, providing an opportunity to better dissect cancer heterogeneity. Here, we propose sparse canonical correlation analysis for cancer classification (SCCA-CC), which projects each type of single-omics data onto a unified space for data fusion, followed by clustering and classification analysis. Without loss of generality, as case studies, we integrated two types of omics data, mRNA and miRNA profiles, for molecular classification of ovarian cancer (

Indexed as

breast cancercancer subtypingcanonical correlation analysisdata fusionmulti-omicsovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID34367231
PMCPMC8341864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.