Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34367209›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021

High-Throughput Sequencing of Small RNAs for the Sanitary Certification of Viruses in Grapevine.

Leonardo Velasco, Carlos V Padilla

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leonardo VelascoInstituto Andaluz de Investigación y Formación Agraria, Málaga, Spain.
Carlos V PadillaInstituto Murciano de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario y Alimentario, Murcia, Spain.
Andalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research and Training · ESInstituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological indexing is the method generally recognized for the certification of propagative grapevines in many countries, and it is mandatory in the European Union. It consists of the evaluation of the plant material after grafting on indicators that are inspected for symptom development. This is a lengthy process that requires well-trained workers, testing field, etc. Alternative diagnostic methods such as serology and RT-qPCR have been discarded for certification because of their intrinsic drawbacks. In turn, high-throughput sequencing (HTS) of plant RNA has been proposed as a plausible alternative to bioassay, but before it is accepted, different aspects of this process must be evaluated. We have compared the HTS of small RNAs with bioassays and other diagnostic methods from a set of 40 grapevine plants submitted for certification. The results allowed the authors the identification of numerous grapevine viruses in the samples, as well as different variants. Besides, relationships between symptom expression and viromes were investigated, in particular leafroll-associated viruses. We compared HTS results using analytical and bioinformatics approaches in order to define minimum acceptable quality standards for certification schemes, resulting in a pipeline proposal. Finally, the comparison between HTS and bioassay resulted favorable for the former in terms of reliability, cost, and timing.

Indexed as

bioassaycertificationcost analysisdiagnosticsgrapevinehigh-throughput sequencingviroidvirus

Identifiers

PMID34367209
PMCPMC8336637
OpenAlexW3186318628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.