ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2021
Determining Diagnostic Criteria of Unexplained Recurrent Implantation Failure: A Retrospective Study of Two
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidence of pregnancy outcomes among patients with recurrent implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Pooled it
- Different effectiveness of acupuncture treatment schedule on ART pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Pooled it
- Does endometrial receptivity array improve reproductive outcomes in euploid embryo transfer cycles? a systematic review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Pooled it
- Optimizing the Endometrial Factor in Recurrent Implantation Failure: From Established Diagnostics to Mechanism-Informed Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Multi-omics biomarkers in endometrial receptivity: from mechanisms to clinical translation.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Evaluation of Th1-Th2 balance in patients with recurrent implantation failure; a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC immunology · 2026Review
- Treatment experience of patients with failedFrontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Outcomes of Ultimpro Testing Implementation for Patients With Unexplained Recurrent Implantation Failure: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2025Article
- The impact of GnRH agonists on endometrial immune cells in patients with adenomyosis: a prospective cohort study.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Factors influencing endometrial receptivity in women with recurrent implantation failure.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Shoutai Pill Enhances Endometrial Receptivity in Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Mice by Improving theCombinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2025Article
- Efficacy of intrauterine autologous blood cell derivatives in enhancing endometrial thickness and IVF outcomes for women with recurrent implantation failure: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Intravenous immunoglobulin for patients with unexplained recurrent implantation failure: a 6-year single center retrospective review of clinical outcomes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Molecular Determinants of Uterine Receptivity: Comparison of Successful Implantation, Recurrent Miscarriage, and Recurrent Implantation Failure.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- NK and T Cell Subtypes in the Endometrium of Patients with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Recurrent Implantation Failure: Implications for Pregnancy Success.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Association between endometrial senescent cells and immune cells in women with repeated implantation failure.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Article
- Effect of low-molecular-weight heparin in women undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Histological endometrial dating: a reliable tool for personalized frozen-thawed embryo transfer in patients with repeated implantation failure in natural cycles.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Endometrial fluid biomarkers and their potential as predictors of successful embryo implantation.BioMedicine · 2023Review
- Outcome of Different Endometrial Preparation Protocols Prior to Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer on Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Repeated Implantation Failure.International journal of women's health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The definition of recurrent implantation failure (RIF) differs clinically, one of the most controversial diagnostic criteria is the number of failed treatment cycles. We tried to investigate whether the two implantation failure could be included in the diagnostic criteria of RIF. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of patients (N=1518) aged under 40 years with two or more implantation failure, recruited from the Center for Reproductive Medicine of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2016 to June 2019. Results: After adjusting for confounding factors by using binary logistic regression, the results showed that partial general information and: distribution of associated factors were significant differences such as maternal age ( Conclusion: For patients with unexplained recurrent implantation failure, two implantation failure cannot be included in the diagnostic criteria of RIF. This study supports the generally accepted definition of three or more failed treatment cycles for RIF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.