Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34366987›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

Automated Scoring of Tablet-Administered Expressive Language Tests.

Robert Gale, Julie Bird, Yiyi Wang, Jan van Santen, Emily Prud'hommeaux, Jill Dolata, Meysam Asgari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Refining Semantic Similarity of Paraphasias Using a Contextual Language Model.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robert GaleCenter for Spoken Language Understanding, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland, OR, United States.
Julie BirdCenter for Spoken Language Understanding, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland, OR, United States.
Yiyi WangBoston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, United States.
Jan van SantenCenter for Spoken Language Understanding, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland, OR, United States.
Emily Prud'hommeauxBoston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, United States.
Jill DolataCenter for Spoken Language Understanding, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland, OR, United States.
Meysam AsgariCenter for Spoken Language Understanding, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland, OR, United States.

Funding

Automatic Voice-Based Assessment of Language AbilitiesR01DC013996 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ASGARI, MEYSAM, DOLATA, JILL KALAT · 2016 to 2020
$3.0M
Automated Assessment of Cognitive Tests for Detecting Mild Cognitive ImpairmentR21AG055749 · NIA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ASGARI, MEYSAM · 2017 to 2018
$373k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG055749NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013996
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech and language impairments are common pediatric conditions, with as many as 10% of children experiencing one or both at some point during development. Expressive language disorders in particular often go undiagnosed, underscoring the immediate need for assessments of expressive language that can be administered and scored reliably and objectively. In this paper, we present a set of highly accurate computational models for automatically scoring several common expressive language tasks. In our assessment framework, instructions and stimuli are presented to the child on a tablet computer, which records the child's responses in real time, while a clinician controls the pace and presentation of the tasks using a second tablet. The recorded responses for four distinct expressive language tasks (expressive vocabulary, word structure, recalling sentences, and formulated sentences) are then scored using traditional paper-and-pencil scoring and using machine learning methods relying on a deep neural network-based language representation model. All four tasks can be scored automatically from both clean and verbatim speech transcripts with very high accuracy at the item level (83-99%). In addition, these automated scores correlate strongly and significantly (ρ = 0.76-0.99,

Indexed as

assessmentautomated scoringexpressive languagelanguage disordersneural language modelsspeech

Identifiers

PMID34366987
PMCPMC8339965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.