Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34366722›Full record

ArticleAnnual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics2020

Gene Drive Dynamics in Natural Populations: The Importance of Density Dependence, Space, and Sex.

Sumit Dhole, Alun L Lloyd, Fred Gould

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Modeling Control of Invasive Fire Ants by Gene Drive.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  8. Predicting the invasiveness of threshold-dependent gene drives.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Parental-effect gene-drive elements under partial selfing, or why dobioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sumit DholeDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA.
Alun L LloydBiomathematics Graduate Program and Department of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-8213, USA.
Fred GouldDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA.

Funding

Combining Aedes aegypti genomics and modeling to improve gene drive strategies and our understanding of resistance evolutionR01AI139085 · NIAID · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI GOULD, FRED · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI139085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spread of synthetic gene drives is often discussed in the context of panmictic populations connected by gene flow and described with simple deterministic models. Under such assumptions, an entire species could be altered by releasing a single individual carrying an invasive gene drive, such as a standard homing drive. While this remains a theoretical possibility, gene drive spread in natural populations is more complex and merits a more realistic assessment. The fate of any gene drive released in a population would be inextricably linked to the population's ecology. Given the uncertainty often involved in ecological assessment of natural populations, understanding the sensitivity of gene drive spread to important ecological factors is critical. Here we review how different forms of density dependence, spatial heterogeneity, and mating behaviors can impact the spread of self-sustaining gene drives. We highlight specific aspects of gene drive dynamics and the target populations that need further research.

Indexed as

CRISPRdensity dependencegenetic pest managementpopulation alterationspatial dynamicsunderdominance

Identifiers

PMID34366722
PMCPMC8340601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.