Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34366688›Full record

ArticleVirtual reality2022

Could virtual reality applications pose real risks to children and adolescents? A systematic review of ethical issues and concerns.

Polyxeni Kaimara, Andreas Oikonomou, Ioannis Deliyannis

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virtual reality, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07752680 (The Effect of Virtual Reality Headset Use on Pain, Comfort, and Psychosocial Symptoms in Children Undergoing Hypospadias Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
52.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07752680 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Virtual Reality Headset Use on Pain, Comfort, and Psychosocial Symptoms in Children Undergoing Hypospadias Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul Medipol University HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled62ConditionsPain, Comfort, Psychosocial SymptomsArmsVirtual reality headset, routine clinical practice
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 191 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Application of virtual reality for supportive care in cancer patients: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Polyxeni KaimaraDepartment of Audio and Visual Arts, Ionian University, Tsirigoti Sq. 7, 49100 Corfu, Greece.
Andreas OikonomouSchool of Pedagogical and Technological Education (ASPETE), Alexandrou Papanastasiou 13, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Ioannis DeliyannisDepartment of Audio and Visual Arts, Ionian University, Tsirigoti Sq. 7, 49100 Corfu, Greece.
Ionian University · GRSchool of Pedagogical and Technological Education · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual reality technologies (VRTs) are high-tech human-computer interfaces used to develop digital content and can be applied to multiple different areas, often offering innovative solutions to existing problems. A wide range of digital games is being also developed with VRTs and together with their components, the games' structural elements are appealing to children and engaging them more in virtual worlds. Our research interest is directed towards children's development and the effects of VRTs within gaming environments. Contemporary psychology studies perceive human development as a holistic and lifelong process with important interrelationships between physical, mental, social and emotional aspects. For the objectives and scope of this work, we examine children development across three domains: physical, cognitive and psychosocial. In this context, the authors review the literature on the impact of VRTs on children, in terms of software and hardware. Since research requires an wide-ranging approach, we study the evidence reported on the brain and neural structure, knowledge, behaviour, pedagogy, academic performance, and wellness. Our main concern is to outline the emerging ethical issues and worries of parents, educators, ophthalmologists, neurologists, psychologists, paediatricians and all relevant scientists, as well as the industry's views and actions. The systematic review was performed on the databases Scopus, IEEE Xplore, PubMed, and Google Scholar from 2010 to 2020 and 85 studies were selected. The review concluded that findings remain contradictory especially for the psychosocial domain. Official recommendations from organizations and well-documented researches by academics on child well-being are reassuring if health and safety specifications and particularly the time limit are met. Research is still ongoing, constantly updated and consist of a priority for the scientific community given that technology evolves.

Indexed as

Child developmentEthical issuesGamesImpact of technologySafetyVirtual reality technologies

Identifiers

PMID34366688
PMCPMC8328811
OpenAlexW3191648867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.