Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34366643›Full record

ArticleConsulting psychology journal2021

Going the Distance: Technical Assistance to Community Prevention Coalitions and its impact on Prevention Coalitions Over Time.

Sarah M Chilenski, Janet A Welsh, Daniel F Perkins, Lesa Hoffman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Consulting psychology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Improvements in Capacity Among Community Coalitions Receiving Technical Assistance Through the Coalition Check-Up.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah M ChilenskiPrevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University.
Janet A WelshPrevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University.
Daniel F PerkinsPrevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University.
Lesa HoffmanPsychological and Quantitative Foundations, University of Iowa.

Funding

Partnership Model for Diffusion of Proven PreventionR01DA013709 · NIDA · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SPOTH, RICHARD · 2002 to 2017
$35.0M
Rural Family and Community Drug Abuse Prevention ProjectR01AA014702 · NIAAA · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SPOTH, RICHARD · 2003 to 2007
$3.0M
Toward a PROSPER State Partnership Network: Building Infrastructure and CapacityRC2DA028879 · NIDA · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SPOTH, RICHARD · 2009 to 2010
$2.7M
Adoption and Implementation Support Innovations for PROSPER Partnership-Based EBIR18DP002279 · DP · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GREENBERG, MARK T., SPOTH, RICHARD · 2009 to 2011
$1.3M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS R18 DP002279NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA014702NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013709NIDA NIH HHS RC2 DA028879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prevention Coordinators are the linking agents providing technical assistance between universities and communities in the PROSPER model to support the implementation and sustainability of youth and family programs that have reduced substance abuse in prior research. This study examines the outcomes and trajectory of the frequency of contact of technical assistance (i.e. dosage) with community collaborative prevention coalitions across the three stages of coalition development. After communities were randomized, members of PROSPER coalitions (n=12) provided information about the quality of their operations at five time points across four and one-half years; prevention coordinators reported on the frequency of contact with their community coalitions at 14 intervals across the same period of time. This study only utilizes the intervention communities. Results from correlational models show that levels of dosage relate to the quality of internal coalition processes over time, but that the direction of the relationship changes over time: high frequency of contact early on relates to lower coalition-rated functioning initially. In contrast, early frequency of contact relates to higher levels of coalition functioning at later time points. Furthermore, longitudinal mixed models show that levels of dosage were consistent over time. These results provide empirical support of the importance of a proactive technical assistance model and add further evidence that important distinctions exist among different coalition developmental phases.

Indexed as

community prevention systemdosagelongitudinalprocess evaluationtechnical assistance

Identifiers

PMID34366643
PMCPMC8341402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.