Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34366622›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2021

Management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis: Endoscopic and surgical approaches.

Pasquale Cianci, Enrico Restini

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06514911 (Primary Closure Versus T-tube Drainage Following Laparoscopic Cholodochotomy in Management of CBD Stones), which is not on this map. Cited by 88 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
18.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06514911 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Primary Closure Versus T-tube Drainage Following Laparoscopic Cholodochotomy in Management of CBD Stones

TypeinterventionalSponsorSohag UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsManagement of CBD StonesArmsprimary closure following Laparoscopic cholodochotomy in management of CBD stones, T-tube drainage following Laparoscopic cholodochotomy in management of CBD stones
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 172 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Choledocholithiasis Patients at Different Age Groups: A Meta-Analysis.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Antegrade transcystic balloon dilatation in emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy with MRCP validation.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pasquale CianciDepartment of Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Lorenzo Bonomo, Andria 76123, Italy. ciancidoc1@virgilio.it.
Enrico RestiniDepartment of Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Lorenzo Bonomo, Andria 76123, Italy.
Ospedale L. Bonomo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gallstone disease and complications from gallstones are a common clinical problem. The clinical presentation ranges between being asymptomatic and recurrent attacks of biliary pain requiring elective or emergency treatment. Bile duct stones are a frequent condition associated with cholelithiasis. Amidst the total cholecystectomies performed every year for cholelithiasis, the presence of bile duct stones is 5%-15%; another small percentage of these will develop common bile duct stones after intervention. To avoid serious complications that can occur in choledocholithiasis, these stones should be removed. Unfortunately, there is no consensus on the ideal management strategy to perform such. For a long time, a direct open surgical approach to the bile duct was the only unique approach. With the advent of advanced endoscopic, radiologic, and minimally invasive surgical techniques, however, therapeutic choices have increased in number, and the management of this pathological situation has become multidisciplinary. To date, there is agreement on preoperative management and the need to treat cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis, but a debate still exists on how to cure the two diseases at the same time. In the era of laparoscopy and mini-invasiveness, we can say that therapeutic approaches can be performed in two sessions or in one session. Comparison of these two approaches showed equivalent success rates, postoperative morbidity, stone clearance, mortality, conversion to other procedures, total surgery time, and failure rate, but the one-session treatment is characterized by a shorter hospital stay, and more cost benefits. The aim of this review article is to provide the reader with a general summary of gallbladder stone disease in association with the presence of common bile duct stones by discussing their epidemiology, clinical and diagnostic aspects, and possible treatments and their advantages and limitations.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCholedocholithiasisGallstonesLaparoscopyCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeHumansSphincterotomy, EndoscopicCholedocholithiasisEndoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatographyGallbladder stonesLaparoscopic cholecystectomyManagement of biliary lithiasisRendezvous technique

Identifiers

PMID34366622
PMCPMC8326257
OpenAlexW3183523074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.