Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34366612›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2021

Role of artificial intelligence in multidisciplinary imaging diagnosis of gastrointestinal diseases.

M Alvaro Berbís, José Aneiros-Fernández, F Javier Mendoza Olivares, Enrique Nava, Antonio Luna

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. [Expert consensus on artificial intelligence-assisted data acquisition and clinical application in electronic nasopharyngolaryngoscopy].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Rapid and Efficient Screening ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M Alvaro BerbísDepartment of R&D, HT Médica, Madrid 28046, Madrid, Spain.
José Aneiros-FernándezDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada 18012, Spain.
F Javier Mendoza OlivaresDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fatima Clinic, Sevilla 41012, Spain.
Enrique NavaDepartment of Communications Engineering, University of Málaga, Malaga 29016, Spain.
Antonio LunaMRI Unit, Department of Radiology, HT Médica, Jaén 23007, Spain. aluna70@htime.org.
Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada · ESUniversidad de Málaga · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of artificial intelligence-based tools is regarded as a promising approach to increase clinical efficiency in diagnostic imaging, improve the interpretability of results, and support decision-making for the detection and prevention of diseases. Radiology, endoscopy and pathology images are suitable for deep-learning analysis, potentially changing the way care is delivered in gastroenterology. The aim of this review is to examine the key aspects of different neural network architectures used for the evaluation of gastrointestinal conditions, by discussing how different models behave in critical tasks, such as lesion detection or characterization (

Indexed as

GastroenterologyGastrointestinal DiseasesArtificial IntelligenceDiagnostic ImagingHumansNeural Networks, ComputerArtificial intelligenceEndoscopyGastroenterologyMachine learningPathologyRadiology

Identifiers

PMID34366612
PMCPMC8316909
OpenAlexW3186039282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.