Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34366577›Full record

ArticleExpert systems with applications2021

Data augmentation approaches using cycle-consistent adversarial networks for improving COVID-19 screening in portable chest X-ray images.

Daniel Iglesias Morís, José Joaquim de Moura Ramos, Jorge Novo Buján, Marcos Ortega Hortas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Expert systems with applications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Detection and Prevention of Virus Infection.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel Iglesias MorísCentro de Investigación CITIC, Universidade da Coruña, Campus de Elviña, s/n, 15071 A Coruña, Spain.
José Joaquim de Moura RamosCentro de Investigación CITIC, Universidade da Coruña, Campus de Elviña, s/n, 15071 A Coruña, Spain.
Jorge Novo BujánCentro de Investigación CITIC, Universidade da Coruña, Campus de Elviña, s/n, 15071 A Coruña, Spain.
Marcos Ortega HortasCentro de Investigación CITIC, Universidade da Coruña, Campus de Elviña, s/n, 15071 A Coruña, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current COVID-19 pandemic, that has caused more than 100 million cases as well as more than two million deaths worldwide, demands the development of fast and accurate diagnostic methods despite the lack of available samples. This disease mainly affects the respiratory system of the patients and can lead to pneumonia and to severe cases of acute respiratory syndrome that result in the formation of several pathological structures in the lungs. These pathological structures can be explored taking advantage of chest X-ray imaging. As a recommendation for the health services, portable chest X-ray devices should be used instead of conventional fixed machinery, in order to prevent the spread of the pathogen. However, portable devices present several problems (specially those related with capture quality). Moreover, the subjectivity and the fatigue of the clinicians lead to a very difficult diagnostic process. To overcome that, computer-aided methodologies can be very useful even taking into account the lack of available samples that the COVID-19 affectation shows. In this work, we propose an improvement in the performance of COVID-19 screening, taking advantage of several cycle generative adversarial networks to generate useful and relevant synthetic images to solve the lack of COVID-19 samples, in the context of poor quality and low detail datasets obtained from portable devices. For validating this proposal for improved COVID-19 screening, several experiments were conducted. The results demonstrate that this data augmentation strategy improves the performance of a previous COVID-19 screening proposal, achieving an accuracy of 98.61% when distinguishing among NON-COVID-19 (

Indexed as

COVID-19CycleGANData augmentationDeep learningScreeningX-ray portable device

Identifiers

PMID34366577
PMCPMC8325379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.