ArticleExpert systems with applications2021
Wavelet and deep learning-based detection of SARS-nCoV from thoracic X-ray images for rapid and efficient testing.
Article in Expert systems with applications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lung Disease Classification with Deep Learning Enhanced CNN Architecture in Chest X-Ray Imaging.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- A frequency-spatial dual perception network for efficient and accurate medical image segmentation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Enhanced detonators detection in X-ray baggage inspection by image manipulation and deep convolutional neural networks.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Coronavirus disease identification using Multi-subband feature analysis in DWT domain.Procedia computer science · 2023Article
- A wavelet-based deep learning pipeline for efficient COVID-19 diagnosis via CT slices.Applied soft computing · 2022Article
- Detection and Prevention of Virus Infection.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Article
- A Deep Learning and Handcrafted Based Computationally Intelligent Technique for Effective COVID-19 Detection from X-ray/CT-scan Imaging.Journal of grid computing · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper proposes a wavelet and artificial intelligence-enabled rapid and efficient testing procedure for patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Coronavirus Syndrome (SARS-nCoV) through a deep learning approach from thoracic X-ray images. Presently, the virus infection is diagnosed primarily by a process called the real-time Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) based on its genetic prints. This whole procedure takes a substantial amount of time to identify and diagnose the patients infected by the virus. The proposed research uses a wavelet-based convolution neural network architectures to detect SARS-nCoV. CNN is pre-trained on the ImageNet and trained end-to-end using thoracic X-ray images. To execute Discrete Wavelet Transforms (DWT), the available mother wavelet functions from different families, namely Haar, Daubechies, Symlet, Biorthogonal, Coiflet, and Discrete Meyer, were considered. Two-level decomposition via DWT is adopted to extract prominent features peripheral and subpleural ground-glass opacities, often in the lower lobes explicitly from thoracic X-ray images to suppress noise effect, further enhancing the signal to noise ratio. The proposed wavelet-based deep learning models of both, two-class instances (COVID vs. Normal) and four-class instances (COVID-19 vs. PNA bacterial vs. PNA viral vs. Normal) were validated from publicly available databases using k-Fold Cross Validation (k-Fold CV) technique. In addition to these X-ray images, images of recent COVID-19 patients were further used to examine the model's practicality and real-time feasibility in combating the current pandemic situation. It was observed that the Symlet 7 approximation component with two-level manifested the highest test accuracy of 98.87%, followed by Biorthogonal 2.6 with an efficiency of 98.73%. While the test accuracy for Symlet 7 and Biorthogonal 2.6 is high, Haar and Daubechies with two levels have demonstrated excellent validation accuracy on unseen data. It was also observed that the precision, the recall rate, and the dice similarity coefficient for four-class instances were 98%, 98%, and 99%, respectively, using the proposed algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.