ArticleNeuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press)2021
Should "Retro-ocular Pain, Photophobia and Visual Acuity Loss" Be Recognised as a Distinct Entity? The ROPPVAL Syndrome.
Article in Neuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of Proteomics Analysis and Animal Models in Optic Nerve Injury Diseases.Brain sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unilateral retro-ocular pain, photophobia and visual disturbance in patients suspected as having acute optic neuritis was described as a distinct clinical entity by Jefferis et al. in 2018. We hereby report a further four patients with the same clinical phenotype and propose the term ROPPVAL syndrome (Retro-Ocular Pain, Photophobia and Visual Acuity Loss). All of them had a previous (mis)diagnosis of optic neuritis. All of the patients had normal ocular and neurological examinations, no relative afferent pupillary defect and no objective structural abnormality was identified. We also discuss possible mechanisms, the role of cycloplegics that we found to be useful in reducing symptoms, and the importance of distinguishing this syndrome from optic neuritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.