Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34366512›Full record

ArticleNeuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press)2021

The Effective Management of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Delivered by In-person and Virtual Group Consultations: Results and Reflections from a Phase One Service Delivery.

S H Wong, N Barrow, K Hall, P Gandesha, A Manson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Facilitators and Barriers to Weight Loss Among Patients With Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Implementing video group consultations in general practice during COVID-19: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S H WongEye Department, Guy & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2554-6731
N BarrowEye Department, Guy & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
K HallEye Department, Guy & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
P GandeshaEye Department, Guy & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
A MansonGroup Consultations Ltd, Glasgow, UK.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing incidence of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) with the obesity epidemic is leading to increased pressures on service capacity. Evidence shows that group consultations (GCs) deliver effective, person-centred healthcare, but the feasibility for IIH is unknown. We set out to develop and test a safe and effective GC service for IIH. Through an interactive approach, we co-designed a bespoke in-person and virtual GC model, where patients are reviewed in a group setting. Improvements were made following each session following patient input and team reflections. Outcomes measured included patient satisfaction, self-perceived health literacy, and successful implementation of the GCs. During the pilot, eight in-person GCs were delivered: once-monthly (Oct-Dec 2019), then twice-monthly (Jan-Feb 2020). Feedback was received from 49/53 patients. 100% felt more satisfied and heard, 100% felt more involved in decision-making, 98% had a better understanding of their condition, 96% felt more able to cope with their condition and keep themselves healthy, 94% rated this as a positive experience, and 90% reported improved access and more time with their clinician compared with existing 1:1 appointments. Since September 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we transitioned to weekly virtual GCs, receiving overwhelmingly positive feedback (median scores: patient satisfaction 9.5/10; being listened to by clinician 10/10; involved by clinician in treatment decisions 10/10; clinician explanation of treatment 10/10; and opportunity to discuss condition or treatment 10/10). GCs are safe and effective for IIH, and preferred in our patient cohort. This allowed ongoing high-quality, person-centred care despite challenges from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

Group Consultationsidiopathic intracranial hypertension

Identifiers

PMID34366512
PMCPMC8312588
OpenAlexW3163581863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.