Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34366490›Full record

ArticleSimulation2021

Advanced models for centroidal particle dynamics: short-range collision avoidance in dense crowds.

Omar Hesham, Gabriel Wainer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Simulation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Omar HeshamDepartment of Systems and Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Canada.
Gabriel WainerDepartment of Systems and Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3366-9184
Carleton University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer simulation of dense crowds is finding increased use in event planning, congestion prediction, and threat assessment. State-of-the-art particle-based crowd methods assume and aim for collision-free trajectories. That is an idealistic yet not overly realistic expectation, as near-collisions increase in dense and rushed settings compared with typically sparse pedestrian scenarios. Centroidal particle dynamics (CPD) is a method we defined that explicitly models the compressible personal space area surrounding each entity to inform its local pathing and collision-avoidance decisions. We illustrate how our proposed agent-based method for local dynamics can reproduce several key emergent dense crowd phenomena at the microscopic level with higher congruence to real trajectory data and with more visually convincing collision-avoidance paths than the existing state of the art. We present advanced models in which we consider distraction of the pedestrians in the crowd, flocking behavior, interaction with vehicles (ambulances, police) and other advanced models that show that emergent behavior in the simulated crowds is similar to the behavior observed in reality. We discuss how to increase confidence in CPD, potentially making it also suitable for use in safety-critical applications, including urban design, evacuation analysis, and crowd-safety planning.

Indexed as

Agent-based modelingcrowd modeling and simulationcrowd pedestrian modelsGPUheterogeneous crowdparticle dynamicspersonal space

Identifiers

PMID34366490
PMCPMC8293761
OpenAlexW3153535505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.