Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34366325›Full record

ArticleCancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers2022

Assessment of a panel of miRNAs in serum and pleural fluid for the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign pleural effusion.

Li-Rong Zhu, Rong-Xia Yuan, Xian-Bin Xia, Yi Wang, Yu-Min Zhu, Ling Fi, Jian Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Advances in applications of artificial intelligence algorithms for cancer-related miRNA research.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Observational
  8. miRNAs in Cancer (Review of Literature).International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Li-Rong ZhuDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China.
Rong-Xia YuanDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China.
Xian-Bin XiaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China.
Yi WangCenter of Experimental Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China.
Yu-Min ZhuDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China.
Ling FiDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China.
Jian LiDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China.
Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University · CNJiangsu University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferential diagnosis between malignant pleural effusion (MPE) and benign pleural effusion (BPE) remains a clinical challenge.

objectiveThe aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of the serum and pleural fluid (PF) miRNA panels in distinguishing MPE from BPE.

methodsFourteen candidate miRNAs which were shown aberrant expression in lung cancer based on previous studies were tested by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) in 20 MPE patients and 20 BPE patients. Significantly aberrantly expressed miRNAs were further assessed by qRT-PCR in all patients enrolled in this study. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluated the diagnostic performance of the miRNAs.

resultsmiR-21, miR-29c and miR-182 were found to be significantly aberrantly expressed in the serum and PF of MPE patients. The AUCs for the combination of miR-21, miR-29c and miR-182 in serum and PF were 0.832 and 0.89 respectively in distinguishing MPE from infection-associated PE including tuberculous pleurisy and parapneumonia PE, and 0.866 and 0.919 respectively for differentiating MPE from heart failure-associated PE, which were superior to AUC of each individual miRNAs.

conclusionsmiR-21, miR-29c and miR-182 in serum and PF could be useful biomarkers for diagnosis of MPE.

Indexed as

MicroRNAsPleural EffusionPleural Effusion, MalignantBiomarkers, TumorDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsMIRN21 microRNA, humanbiomarkersdifferential diagnosismiR-182miR-21miR-29cPleural effusion

Identifiers

PMID34366325
PMCPMC12364129
OpenAlexW3189484223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.