ArticleJournal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA
Kentucky pharmacists' perceptions regarding provision of hormonal contraception.
Article in Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough Kentucky pharmacists recently gained authority to provide protocol-driven care for 13 conditions, provision of prescription hormonal contraception (HC) services is not currently authorized. A board-approved protocol allowing for provision of nonprescription over-the-counter (OTC) emergency contraception (EC) was recently approved by the Kentucky Board of Pharmacy but has yet to be implemented.
objectivesThe objectives of this study were (1) to assess Kentucky pharmacists' interest in providing prescription HC and OTC EC services via protocol and (2) to identify perceived benefits/barriers regarding provision of prescription HC.
methodsAn online questionnaire was disseminated electronically to a convenience sample of Kentucky pharmacists. The questionnaire collected (1) demographic information, (2) opinions regarding provision of prescription HC and OTC EC, and (3) perceived benefits and barriers regarding provision of prescription HC. For analysis, responses were limited to pharmacists in community-based practice. McNemar's test was used to identify statistically significant differences in support by dosage form. In addition, a multivariable logistic regression model was used to examine associations between demographic factors and support for pharmacist provision of prescription HC.
resultsWe received 151 responses from community-based pharmacists. Support for provision of prescription HC was highest for oral (61%) and transdermal (54%) forms. We found no statistically significant differences in support among demographic factors other than number of years in practice, with more recent graduates being at higher odds of support. In addition, time, reimbursement, training, and belief in the need for pelvic exams were the most commonly cited barriers to implementation. With regard to OTC EC provision, pharmacists were largely supportive (62%) and confident in their abilities.
conclusionsCommunity-based pharmacists in Kentucky are supportive of provision of oral, vaginal, and transdermal prescription HC as well as OTC EC via protocol. Barriers, including time, reimbursement, training, and belief in the need for pelvic exams, should be addressed to increase support for prescription HC provision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.