Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34365976›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2021

Is three-dimensional-printed custom-made ultra-short stem with a porous structure an acceptable reconstructive alternative in peri-knee metaphysis for the tumorous bone defect?

Jie Wang, Jingjing An, Minxun Lu, Yuqi Zhang, Jingqi Lin, Yi Luo, Yong Zhou, Li Min, Chongqi Tu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jie Wang *Department of Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Jingjing An *Department of Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Minxun LuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Yuqi ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Jingqi LinDepartment of Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Yi LuoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Yong ZhouDepartment of Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Li Min *Department of Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Chongqi Tu *Department of Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China. Tucq@scu.edu.cn.
Sichuan University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

1.3.5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University ZYJC18036Chengdu Science and Technology Project 2017-CY02-00032-GXNational Key Research and Development Program of China 2016YFC1102003National Key Research and Development Program of China 2017YFB0702604
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-lasting reconstruction after extensive resection involving peri-knee metaphysis is a challenging problem in orthopedic oncology. Various reconstruction methods have been proposed, but they are characterized by a high complication rate. The purposes of this study were to (1) assess osseointegration at the bone implant interface and correlated incidence of aseptic loosening; (2) identify complications including infection, endoprosthesis fracture, periprosthetic fracture, leg length discrepancy, and wound healing problem in this case series; and (3) evaluate the short-term function of the patient who received this personalized reconstruction system.

methodsBetween September 2016 and June 2018, our center treated 15 patients with malignancies arising in the femur or tibia shaft using endoprosthesis with a 3D-printed custom-made stem. Osseointegration and aseptic loosening were assessed with digital tomosynthesis. Complications were recorded by reviewing the patients' records. The function was evaluated with the 1993 version of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS-93) score at a median of 42 (range, 34 to 54) months after reconstruction.

resultsOne patient who experienced early aseptic loosening was managed with immobilization and bisphosphonates infusion. All implants were well osseointegrated at the final follow-up examination. There are two periprosthetic fractures intraoperatively. The wire was applied to assist fixation, and the fracture healed at the latest follow-up. Two patients experienced significant leg length discrepancies. The median MSTS-93 score was 26 (range, 23 to 30).

conclusionsA 3D-printed custom-made ultra-short stem with a porous structure provides acceptable early outcomes in patients who received peri-knee metaphyseal reconstruction. With detailed preoperative design and precise intraoperative techniques, the reasonable initial stability benefits osseointegration to osteoconductive porous titanium, and therefore ensures short- and possibly long-term durability. Personalized adaptive endoprosthesis, careful intraoperative operation, and strict follow-up management enable effective prevention and treatment of complications. The functional results in our series were acceptable thanks to reliable fixation in the bone-endoprosthesis interface and an individualized rehabilitation program. These positive results indicate this device series can be a feasible alternative for critical bone defect reconstruction. Nevertheless, longer follow-up is required to determine whether this technique is superior to other forms of fixation.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsHumansKnee JointPorosityPrognosisProsthesis DesignReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCustom-madePeri-knee metaphysisPorous structureStemThree-dimensional-printed

Identifiers

PMID34365976
PMCPMC8349501
OpenAlexW3190856011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.