Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34365923›Full record

ReviewCurrent neuropharmacology2022

The Role of Stem Cells in the Therapy of Stroke.

Maria Ejma, Natalia Madetko, Anna Brzecka, Piotr Alster, Sławomir Budrewicz, Magdalena Koszewicz, Marta Misiuk-Hojło, Irina K Tomilova, Siva G Somasundaram, Cecil E Kirkland

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current neuropharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Microneedle-Mediated Cell Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Maria EjmaDepartment of Neurology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wrocław, Borowska 213, Poland.
Natalia MadetkoDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Warsaw, Kondratowicza 8, 03-242 Warszawa, Poland.
Anna BrzeckaDepartment of Pulmonology and Lung Oncology, Wroclaw Medical University, Grabiszynska 105, 53-439 Wroclaw, Poland.
Piotr AlsterDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Warsaw, Kondratowicza 8, 03-242 Warszawa, Poland.
Sławomir BudrewiczDepartment of Neurology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wrocław, Borowska 213, Poland.
Magdalena KoszewiczDepartment of Neurology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wrocław, Borowska 213, Poland.
Marta Misiuk-HojłoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Borowska 213, Poland.
Irina K TomilovaDepartment of Biochemistry, Ivanovo State Medical Academy, Avenue Sheremetyevsky 8, Ivanovo, 153012, Russian Federation.
Siva G SomasundaramDepartment of Biological Sciences, Salem University, Salem, WV, 26426, USA.
Cecil E KirklandDepartment of Biological Sciences, Salem University, Salem, WV, 26426, USA.
Wroclaw Medical University · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PLSalem University · USIvanovo State Medical Academy · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke is a major challenge in neurology due to its multifactorial genesis and irreversible consequences. Processes of endogenous post-stroke neurogenesis, although insufficient, may indicate possible direction of future therapy. Multiple research considers stem-cell-based approaches in order to maximize neuroregeneration and minimize post-stroke deficits.

objectiveAim of this study is to review current literature considering post-stroke stem-cell- based therapy and possibilities of inducing neuroregeneration after brain vascular damage.

methodsPapers included in this article were obtained from PubMed and MEDLINE databases. The following medical subject headings (MeSH) were used: "stem cell therapy", "post-stroke neurogenesis", "stem-cells stroke", "stroke neurogenesis", "stroke stem cells", "stroke", "cell therapy", "neuroregeneration", "neurogenesis", "stem-cell human", "cell therapy in human". Ultimate inclusion was made after manual review of the obtained reference list.

resultsAttempts of stimulating neuroregeneration after stroke found in current literature include supporting endogenous neurogenesis, different routes of exogenous stem cells supplying and extracellular vesicles used as a method of particle transport.

conclusionAlthough further research in this field is required, post stroke brain recovery supported by exogenous stem cells seems to be promising future therapy revolutionizing modern neurology.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaStrokeHumansNeurogenesisStem Cell TransplantationCell therapycentral nervous systemextracellular vesiclesneurogenesisstem-cellsstroke

Identifiers

PMID34365923
PMCPMC9608230
OpenAlexW3191348289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.