Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34365861›Full record

ArticleNew solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS2022

Trading One Risk for Another: Consequences of the Unauthenticated Treatment and Prevention of Silicosis in Ontario Miners in the McIntyre Powder Aluminum Inhalation Program.

Janice Martell, Tee L Guidotti

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Breathe Deep, Boys: Voices of the McIntyre Powder Project Miners.New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS · 2022
    Article
  4. Sarcoidosis in Northern Ontario hard-rock miners: A case series.American journal of industrial medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Janice MartellOHCOW Sudbury, Sudbury, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4564-3627
Tee L GuidottiOHCOW Sudbury, Sudbury, ON, Canada.
University of Sudbury · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From 1943 to 1979, miners and factory workers in more than two hundred work sites globally were subjected to mandatory medical treatments by their employers as an unproven, and ultimately ineffective, treatment to prevent the lung disease silicosis. The treatments involved inhaling finely ground aluminum dust known as McIntyre Powder, blown into miners' change rooms each shift using compressed air systems. Tens of thousands of industrial laborers were exposed to McIntyre Powder, yet their story is scarcely known, and the possible health impacts of their aluminum treatments were rarely studied. This paper integrates the history of the aluminum prophylaxis program and its control by the northern Ontario mining industry with the lived experience of one of the affected miners, whose daughter created a voluntary registry which documents health issues in exposed miners, and stimulated research that found a link to her father's Parkinson disease.

Indexed as

MinersOccupational ExposureSilicosisAluminumDustFemaleHumansOntarioPowdersAluminumDustPowdersaluminumMcIntyre Powderoccupational diseaseoccupational hygieneParkinson’ssilicosis

Identifiers

PMID34365861
PMCPMC8739567
OpenAlexW3190447412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.